Back

Faf2 is required for neural differentiation in embryonic neural progenitor cells

Kakebeen, A. D.; Dunphy, L.; Hazen, H. K.; Niswander, L. A.

2026-07-13 developmental biology
10.64898/2026.07.12.737973 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Neural progenitor cell differentiation is a complex process requiring the proper integration of instructive and permissive factors. Instructive cues including signaling molecules and transcription factor networks have been well studied in this context, but permissive factors such as cell homeostasis have not. Cell homeostasis is critical to support the health and stability of a cell and enable the cell to act on instructive differentiation cues. Our study investigates a homeostasis protein, FAF2, and its function in neural progenitor cells. FAF2 is an adaptor protein involved in endoplasmic reticulum (ER) associated degradation to remove misfolded proteins and restore ER homeostasis. Here we show that knocking out Faf2 in neural progenitor cells results in increased ER stress signature at the protein and transcription level, indicating a conserved functional role in neural progenitor cells. Induced neural differentiation of FAF2 deletion cells shows a failure of neurite development but RNA-seq indicates genes that support neural differentiation are induced. Reducing ER stress in FAF2 knockout cells with a small molecule inhibitor can rescue neural differentiation, providing evidence that excess ER stress contributes to the inhibited differentiation. Taken together, these results reveal that FAF2 is a critical protein in neural progenitor cells for the maintenance of ER homeostasis and execution of neural differentiation. Highlights- FAF2 is required to regulate ER homeostasis in neural progenitor cells - FAF2 knockout blocks differentiation of neural progenitor cells to neurons at the cell morphological level, but does not inhibit the mounting of transcriptional programs associated with neural differentiation. - Excess ER stress due to FAF2 knockout contributes to blocked neural differentiation.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 7%
7.8%
2
Cell Death Discovery
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
3
Developmental Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.7%
4
Cell Communication and Signaling
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
5
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.5%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.8%
7
The FEBS Journal
93 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
8
Journal of Cell Science
393 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
9
Development
497 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
10
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
96 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
11
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
12
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
13
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
14
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
15
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
16
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Molecular and Cellular Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
18
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
19
Molecular Biology of the Cell
311 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
20
Molecular Neurobiology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
21
Biochemical Journal
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.1%
23
EMBO Reports
263 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
24
Open Biology
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
25
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.0%
26
The FASEB Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
27
Life Sciences
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
29
Glia
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
30
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%