Task-Based Value Generalization Correlates With Positive Overgeneralization and Bipolar Symptoms
Li, J.; Malaviya, M.; Bennett, D.; Radulescu, A.
Show abstract
Positive overgeneralization - the tendency to generalize from specific successes to broad expectations of future reward - has been linked to vulnerability to mania. Because positive overgeneralization has primarily been assessed using self-report measures, we have limited insight into the underlying cognitive process. Here, we introduce a behavioral paradigm designed to quantify how learned value generalizes to novel stimuli. We quantify individual generalization profiles by fitting psychometric functions to choice data. In an online transdiagnostic study (N=163), we show that task-based breadth of reward generalization is associated with both higher self-reported positive overgeneralization and subclinical bipolar symptoms. To provide a computational account of positive overgeneralization, we implement a reinforcement-learning model in which self-efficacy modulates the influence of anticipated future value during learning. We show that increasing this modulation reproduces the broader value propagation observed empirically. Together, these findings provide a behavioral and computational framework for studying positive overgeneralization, and suggest a mechanistic pathway by which success-related shifts in value representations may bias learning in ways relevant to bipolar risk.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Gambling environment exposure increases temporal discounting but improves model-based control in regular slot-machine gamblers. 94%
- Computational Mechanisms of Approach-Avoidance Conflict Predictively Differentiate Between Affective and Substance Use Disorders 94%
- Aberrant perception of environmental volatility during social learning in emerging psychosis 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.