Back

Explainable Longitudinal Machine Learning for Dementia Progression Using Cognitive and MRI Biomarkers

Duah, G.; Nyarko, E.; Effah, J. Y.; Numoah, I. B.; Lotsi, A.

2026-07-14 geriatric medicine
10.64898/2026.07.12.26357878 medRxiv
Show abstract

Dementia is a progressive neurological condition characterized by cognitive decline and structural brain changes that evolve. Longitudinal modeling of these changes is important for improving disease monitoring, identifying progression patterns, and supporting early risk stratification. This study developed an explainable longitudinal machine-learning framework for dementia progression, using cognitive and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-derived biomarkers from the Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS-2) longitudinal dataset. The dataset included 150 subjects and 373 repeated observations classified as Non-demented, Demented, or Converted. Current-visit features, previous-visit features, and slope-based temporal features were constructed from Mini-Mental State Examination, Clinical Dementia Rating, normalized whole-brain volume, estimated total intracranial volume, atlas scaling factor, Age, and MRI delay. Baseline models were compared with a longitudinal gradient-boosted model, using patient-level splitting to reduce data leakage across repeated visits. The proposed longiGradient Gradient boosting model achieved the best held-out test performance, with an accuracy of 88.16%, a macro F1-score of 0.776, and a weighted F1-score of 0.860. The model showed strong classification performance for Demented and Non-demented individuals, while converted cases remained more difficult to identify. A regularized gradient boosting model was also evaluated as an overfitting sensitivity analysis; although it reduced the perfect training fit, it did not improve held-out test performance. Feature importance, permutation importance, and SHapley Additive exPlanations identified Clinical Dementia Rating as the dominant predictor, with slope-based Clinical Dementia Rating providing additional longitudinal information. These findings suggest that combining cognitive measures, MRI-derived biomarkers, and temporal feature engineering can improve dementia progression modeling, although external validation in larger longitudinal cohorts is needed.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Alzheimer's & Dementia
163 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
11.2%
2
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.0%
4
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.2%
5
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.2%
6
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.5%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.3%
8
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
9
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
10
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
11
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
48 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
14
Neurobiology of Aging
107 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
15
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
16
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
17
Medical Image Analysis
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
18
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
19
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
20
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
24
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
25
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
26
BMC Neurology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
27
Brain Informatics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
28
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
29
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
GeroScience
109 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%