Back

Interactions between Insomnia and Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Dai, Y.; Li, Y.; Heremans, E.; Gimenez, U.; Hanif, U.; Mignot, E.

2026-07-15 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.07.12.26357841 medRxiv
Show abstract

Study Objectives Co morbid insomnia and sleep apnea (COMISA) is challenging clinically and difficult to treat. Our goal was to assess how much COMISA is the mere addition of two phenotypes or display features indicative of genuine statistical interactions. Methods A total of 152,487 patients from 240 sleep centers across 30 US states were included. Insomnia was defined as difficulty initiating/maintaining sleep with daytime fatigue/sleepiness occurring "often"/"always". OSA was defined as having an Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) more than 15 events/h. Modified Poisson regression was conducted to evaluate multiplicative interactions between insomnia and OSA on common comorbidities and sleep symptoms. Additive interactions were also examined. Linear regression models were used to evaluate additive interactions for PSG parameters. The false discovery rate was controlled using the Benjamini Hochberg procedure. Results After adjustment for confounders, insomnia and OSA demonstrated positive interactions for depression, chronic muscular pain, headache, subjective excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), naps, and pre-sleep anxious and muscular tension (adjusted p < 0.05). Furthermore, insomnia and OSA demonstrated positive interactions for parameters related to respiratory disturbance, including AHI, oxygen desaturation index (ODI), respiratory disturbance index (RDI), total arousal index (AI) and respiratory AI, and negative interactions for minimum oxygen saturation and percentage of rapid eye movement stage (REM%) (adjusted p < 0.05). Furthermore, the adverse effects of insomnia and OSA on AHI, ODI, RDI and REM% were substantially amplified in males. Conclusions Our findings demonstrate that insomnia and OSA do not merely coexist but genuinely interact synergistically to amplify selected adverse clinical outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.