Back

Learning the Cellular Dynamics as a Port-Hamiltonian System

Sigdel, D.; Panday, N.

2026-07-13 cell biology
10.64898/2026.07.11.737972 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We present a composite, compartmental, multi-clock port-Hamiltonian model of cell dynamics learned by a graph-neural-network surrogate. The state pairs abundance deviation qj, the quantity omics assays measure, with oscillatory phasors derived only for pools a rhythmicity gate certifies as periodic. The storage function decomposes over five functional compartments (core clock, redox, energy, signalling, biosynthesis), so passivity is certified compartment by compartment, and the model carries two mechanistically distinct clocks coupled through a zero-net-power signalling port, with the central dogma hard-wired and conserved moieties held as exact invariants. We evaluate it on a real mouse-liver tri-omic circadian dataset assembled from public repositories and report a deliberately mixed verdict. The trained model is passive ([Formula], no violations over three seeds), forecasts held-out trajectory segments (RMSE 0.324 {+/-} 0.0004), and recovers withheld regulatory edges above a permuted null (AUROC 0.94 {+/-} 0.01). Its central prediction -- that cross-omic phase lags follow {Delta}{varphi} = arctan({omega}/kdeg) -- matches the aggregate transcript-to-protein lag measured independently (5.7 vs 4.9 h) but not the gene-to-gene variation, and the internal two-clock cascade is not scoreable on the available cross-cohort metabolome. The framework thus gives a falsifiable, thermodynamically-grounded account of cell dynamics with explicit limits.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.6%
2
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.7%
3
Molecular Systems Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
4
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.4%
5
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
6
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.0%
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.0%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 16%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.4%
10
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.4%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
12
Communications Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
14
Nature Cell Biology
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
15
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.7%
16
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.3%
19
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.1%
20
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
22
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
23
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
24
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
25
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.1%
26
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
27
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
28
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
29
Nature Physics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
30
Molecular Cell
350 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%