Chromatic contrasts predict human target detection in a natural search task
White, T. E.; Rojas, B.; Mappes, J.; Kemp, D. J.
Show abstract
Natural scenes are visually complex, with dynamic variation in colour and luminance presenting challenges for detecting salient objects. However, the cues guiding human detection under such natural conditions remain largely untested. We placed custom-built coloured targets in a forest-like setting and quantified their contrasts against natural backgrounds using human visual models. Across human observers (n = 51), detection performance rose sharply with hue and saturation contrast, whereas luminance contrast--long considered a primary driver of visual search--contributed little explanatory power. Strikingly, even large changes in ambient light chromaticity barely altered detection, despite the patchy illumination of the habitat. Under these naturalistic conditions, hue and saturation contrasts were stronger predictors of detection than luminance contrast, providing a rare, field-based test of visual models widely applied across human and animal vision research.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Visual acuity and egg spatial chromatic contrast predict egg rejection behavior of American robins 93%
- Is this scenery worth exploring? Insight into the visual encoding of navigating ants. 93%
- Generating spatiotemporal patterns of linearly polarised light at high frame rates for insect vision research 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.