Back

Shared lipidome and proteome signatures of frontotemporal lobar degeneration and Alzheimer's disease

Ambaw, Y.; Nana, A.; Zhuoning, L.; Singh, S.; Monetti, M.; Miller, B. L.; Spina, S.; Grinberg, L. T.; Seeley, W. W.; Walther, T. C.; Farese, R.

2026-07-11 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.11.737778 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) and Alzheimers disease (AD) differ in their clinical features and genetic etiologies but share progressive cognitive decline. Emerging evidence implicates lipid dysregulation in neurodegeneration, but its extent across FTLD subtypes and how it compares to AD are unclear. Here, we performed integrated lipidomic and proteomic analyses of matched frontal (disease-vulnerable) and occipital (relatively spared) post-mortem cortices from individuals with genetic and sporadic FTLD-TDP, FTLD-tau (Picks disease, PiD), AD, and controls. FTLD and AD exhibited convergent lipid alterations, including reduced levels of cardiolipins and phosphatidylethanolamines, alongside increased gangliosides, diacylglycerols, cholesterol esters, acylcarnitines, and coenzyme Q, with generally greater changes in FTLD frontal cortex. FTLD displayed additional alterations, including reductions in bis(monoacylglycerol)phosphate, ceramides, phosphatidylserines, phosphatidylinositols, and sulfatides. These lipid changes were accompanied by proteomic alterations involving lysosomal proteins, phospholipases, phospholipid remodeling enzymes, and fatty acid oxidation pathways. Although lipidomic and proteomic signatures were broadly shared across FTLD subtypes, GRN associated FTLD-TDP and PiD showed the most extensive alterations. Triglycerides were selectively reduced in PiD in association with decreased DGAT1 expression, whereas cholesterol esters were elevated across all subtypes except C9orf72 associated FTLD-TDP. These findings identify shared disruptions in lipid homeostasis and lysosomal lipid metabolism across FTLD and AD, highlighting convergent metabolic pathways underlying neurodegeneration.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Alzheimer's & Dementia
163 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
31.4%
2
Molecular Neurodegeneration
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Acta Neuropathologica
58 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
4
Neurobiology of Disease
148 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
89 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
6
Translational Neurodegeneration
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.5%
8
Alzheimer's & Dementia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
9
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.1%
10
Aging Cell
165 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
Journal of Neuroinflammation
61 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
12
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
50 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
13
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.1%
14
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
15
GeroScience
109 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
17
Journal of Proteome Research
234 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
npj Parkinson's Disease
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.9%
21
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
Brain
168 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
23
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%