Back

Framework to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the Genome Sequencing-based surveillance network: an integrated operational model-epidemiological model approach

Jha, M.; Reddy, K. N. A.; Arinaminpathy, N.; Mehndiratta, A.; Guzman, J.; Devalkar, S.; Deo, S.

2026-07-13 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.07.11.26351795 medRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding how genomic surveillance capacity translates into population health outcomes is critical for designing effective pandemic response systems, yet the interaction between operational design and epidemiological dynamics remains insufficiently characterized. We develop an integrated analytical framework that links a whole-genome sequencing (WGS) - based surveillance network with a two - variant epidemiological transmission model to evaluate how surveillance operations influence variant detection, intervention timing, and health outcomes. The framework combines a modified susceptible - exposed - infectious - recovered - susceptible (SEIRS) model with a detailed operational representation of a centralized WGS surveillance network in India, incorporating sample collection, transport, batching, sequencing capacity, and reporting delays. We simulate 54 scenario combinations defined by three sequencing capacity levels, three sampling proportions, three variant emergence timings, and two variant profiles (high severity - high immune escape and low severity - low immune escape). Detection of a novel variant triggers a modeled intervention consisting of isolation of some diagnosed individuals, increased testing rates across disease states, and expanded access to hospitalization. Across simulations, the time from variant emergence to intervention implementation ranged from 73 to 351 days, depending on operational and epidemiological conditions. Increasing sampling proportion reduced detection time only when sequencing capacity was sufficient; under constrained capacity, higher sampling increased congestion and delayed detection. Expanding capacity from low to nominal levels substantially reduced turnaround times, with diminishing returns at higher capacity. Earlier detection consistently improved intervention effectiveness, with deaths averted ranging from 0.06% to 14.49% across scenarios. The cost per life - year saved ranged from INR 9,137 to INR 326,714 across all configurations, remaining below one to three times India ' s GDP per capita, consistent with established cost - effectiveness thresholds. These results demonstrate that the performance of genomic surveillance systems is jointly determined by operational and epidemiological dynamics. Effective surveillance design, therefore, requires coordinated optimization of sampling strategies and sequencing capacity to enable timely intervention and maximize population health benefits.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 2%
18.2%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.5%
3
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.1%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 27%
5.4%
5
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.1%
6
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.8%
7
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
Statistics in Medicine
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.2%
10
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
11
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
Emerging Infectious Diseases
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
16
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
129 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
Clinical Infectious Diseases
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
142 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
24
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
25
American Journal of Epidemiology
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
26
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
27
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
28
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Epidemiology and Infection
89 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%