Back

Comparative 3D analysis reveals species-specific patterns of coral polyp morphology and gastrovascular integration

Rangel-Huerta, E.; Wang, M.; Nowotarski, S. H.; Duncan, K. E.; McKinney, S. A.; Gibson, M. C.

2026-07-11 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.07.10.737875 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Coral reefs are constructed by colonial cnidarians whose survival depends on the coordinated growth and physiological integration of thousands of interconnected polyps. While coral skeletons have been extensively studied, the internal three-dimensional organization of coral tissues remains poorly resolved, limiting our understanding of how reef-building corals function as integrated modular organisms. In this study, we established a contrast-enhanced X-ray tomography (XRT) workflow for decalcified coral tissues, enabling detailed visualization and quantitative comparison of internal polyp architecture across four reef-building species with distinct colony forms: Acropora cervicornis, Acropora millepora, Montipora capitata, and Pocillopora damicornis. Importantly, this methodology resolved previously inaccessible patterns of tissue organization and structural connectivity among neighboring polyps. The two Acropora species shared a conserved axial - radial organization but differed in mesenterial morphology, whereas M. capitata exhibited complex, entangled mesenterial networks that connected both neighboring and distant polyps. In contrast, P. damicornis displayed superficial connectivity restricted to the coenosarc. Together, these results suggest that internal tissue architecture is an evolutionarily flexible trait, shaped by ecological and developmental pressures rather than strictly by shared ancestry. Our XRT workflow thus provides a new comparative framework for understanding how corals function as integrated living colonies.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 4%
15.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 6%
8.9%
3
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.8%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 8%
5.5%
5
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.5%
6
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.1%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.3%
9
EvoDevo
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
10
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
11
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.4%
12
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
14
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.9%
15
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
16
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
17
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Coral Reefs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
21
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
23
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.0%
24
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
25
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
26
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
29
Nature Ecology & Evolution
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
30
Open Biology
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%