FUSED: A Functional Representation for Joint Structural and Elemental Analysis of Protein Ligand Binding Sites
Priyankara, T. M. S.; Ellingson, L.
Show abstract
Ligand binding site representations are central to the analysis of protein-ligand interactions, with applications in functional characterization, binding-site comparison, and ligand recognition. Most existing approaches characterize ligand binding sites at a single distance threshold from the ligand, despite substantial variability in how such thresholds are defined and the likelihood that relevant structural and compositional information evolves across spatial scales. We propose Functional Unification of Structural and Elemental Descriptors (FUSED), a multivariate functional rep-resentation that jointly models structural and elemental compositional information of ligand binding sites as functions of distance from the ligand. Structural information is captured through covariance-based descriptors derived from the CDPA framework, while chemical composition is represented through isometric log-ratio coordinates to appropriately account for compositional geometry. Treating distance from the ligand as a continuous functional domain allows the representation to capture evolving patterns that would be lost under fixed-threshold analyses and enables data-driven identification of informative distance ranges. We evaluate FUSED on two benchmark datasets: the Extended Kahraman dataset for multiclass ligand discrimination and the TOUGH-C1 dataset for binary binding-site classification tasks. Across both datasets, the proposed framework yields compact low-dimensional representations with clear discriminatory structure and competitive predictive performance relative to established alignment-based, sequence-based, and machine learning approaches, while maintaining interpretability and low computational cost. These results suggest that functional joint modeling of structural and compositional descriptors provides an effective and flexible framework for ligand binding site analysis.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting Affinity Through Homology (PATH): Interpretable Binding Affinity Prediction with Persistent Homology 94%
- Towards a comprehensive view of the pocketome universe - biological implications and algorithmic challenges. 93%
- Novel, provable algorithms for efficient ensemble-based computational protein design and their application to the redesign of the c-Raf-RBD:KRas protein-protein interface 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.