Back

Global distribution of cultivated Trichodesmium subclades revealed by multi-omics

Zhao, Y.; Cleveland, C. A.; Binkowski, M. R.; Batson, B.; Conover, A. E.; Webb, E. A.

2026-07-10 microbiology
10.64898/2026.07.10.737770 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Trichodesmium is an important oceanic N2 fixing cyanobacterial genus that has been shown to provide up to 50% of new N to oligotrophic regimes. Despite its importance, we know relatively little about the genomic potential and functional diversity of the two major clades of Trichodesmium (Clade I and Clade III, hereafter Thieb and Tery, respectively). With the expanded collection of Trichodesmium isolates in the USCTCC (University of Southern California Trichodesmium Culture Collection), we sequenced genomes from seven cultivated strains to further characterize the genomic diversity within the genus. For example, sequencing the genome of the "gigantic", red Trichodesmium contortum surprisingly shows that they are closely related to the smallest Trichodesmium clade, TeryA. The high genomic identity between TeryA and T. contortum (>98.5% ANI) and lack of implicated auxiliary genes suggests their large biovolume differences might be transcriptional or epigenetic in origin. Furthermore, these data show that using Tery-subclades are a more accurate designation than the classical Trichodesmium species delineation. Finally, we placed the analysis of these genomes in an ecological context via read mapping with globally distributed RNA and DNA datasets. Our data show that Tery clades (A&B) are both lower in relative abundance compared to Thieb in global oceans, generally co-occur when detected in the field, and are highly linked to decreased salinity and increased temperatures, especially for sampling locations in the Bay of Bengal. Lastly, even though TeryA members are undersaturated with respect to current CO2 concentrations, our phenotypic and biogeography data suggests that salinity/ocean color could limit their predicted global impact as climate changes.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The ISME Journal
228 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.7%
2
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.8%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.7%
4
Environmental Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.4%
5
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 12%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
ISME Communications
120 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.3%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.5%
9
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
10
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
11
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
12
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
14
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
16
Environmental Microbiome
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
18
Microbiology Resource Announcements
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
19
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.1%
20
Environmental Microbiology Reports
31 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
21
Journal of Bacteriology
212 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Microbiome
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Journal of Phycology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
24
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
25
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.6%
26
Microbial Genomics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%