Back

A geometric and dynamical theory of latent computations in biological neural networks

Dinc, F.; Blanco-Pozo, M.; Klindt, D.; Acosta, F.; Sylber, C.; Jiang, Y.; Ebrahimi, S.; Shai, A.; Tanaka, H.; Yuan, P.; Miolane, N.; Schnitzer, M. J.

2026-07-15 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.10.737763 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Many neural recordings have revealed low-dimensional sets of behaviorally relevant variables encoded within large-scale neural activity patterns. However, dimensionality reduction analyses alone cannot yield causal explanations for how networks stably implement computations that are resilient to the substantial variability of single neuron dynamics. Further, existing methods for dimensionality reduction often rely on simplifying assumptions about network structure that limit their applicability and explanatory power. To provide a theoretical framework describing the dynamics of low-dimensional computation in high-dimensional neural networks, here we introduce the concept of latent processing units (LPUs), which are architecture-agnostic computational elements operating within biological neural circuitry. Six theorems governing coding and computation by LPUs collectively provide explanations for a range of common biological findings: low-dimensional sets of coding variables can generate high-dimensional neural dynamics; many neurons have activity patterns that represent behaviorally relevant variables but exert little influence on downstream circuits; linear readouts of neural population activity commonly permit near-optimal decoding; the drift of neural representations is often substantial even while network computations remain intact. Overall, our treatment of LPUs, as enacted in network dynamics, unifies the geometric and dynamical views of neural computation under a joint framework and provides systems neuroscience with a causal account of how the brain executes reliable computations.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 2%
15.1%
2
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
15.1%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.7%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 4%
7.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
6
Neuron
337 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
7
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
8
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
9
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.9%
11
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
12
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Neural Computation
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
15
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
16
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
Physical Review Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
21
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.0%
22
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
23
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
24
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
25
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.6%
27
Communications Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
28
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
Neuroscience of Consciousness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%