Back

Plastome phylogenomics of the tribe Spermacoceae (Rubiaceae): taxonomic implications and a key to the genera

Nunez Florentin, M.; Claypool, K.; Huda, N.; Green, K.; Monzel, G.; Schafran, P. W.; Neupane, S.

2026-07-13 plant biology
10.64898/2026.07.10.737747 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The tribe Spermacoceae (Rubiaceae) comprises a morphologically diverse assemblage of approximately 1,400 species distributed across the Neotropics, Africa, Asia, Australia, and Pacific region. It remains one of the most taxonomically intractable groups in the family, with generic limits repeatedly redefined for more than two centuries. Previous phylogenetic studies based on a limited number of plastid and nuclear markers left numerous relationships unresolved and provided sparse representation of Neotropical lineages. Here, we present the first phylogenomic study of the tribe based on plastome-scale data and expanded sampling of Neotropical taxa. We sampled 121 species representing 55 genera spanning all major clades and generated 123 new plastomes, including 25 species incorporated into a molecular phylogenetic framework for the first time. Maximum-likelihood and Bayesian analyses recovered a highly resolved and strongly supported phylogeny, with uncertainty restricted to a small number of deep backbone nodes. Pollen and seed micromorphology provided additional evidence for evaluating phylogenetic relationships. The resulting phylogenetic framework clarifies generic boundaries across several problematic lineages and supports multiple taxonomic changes. Pervasive homoplasy in seed and floral characters rendered several traditionally recognized genera non-monophyletic, warranting new combinations, including Edrastima oxycoccoides, Stenotis alexanderae, and S. prostrata, and a reassessment of taxa such as Terrellianthus serpyllaceus and Oldenlandia dusenii. We further identify genera requiring additional study and provide an updated key to the 82 recognized genera of Spermacoceae. Together, these results provide the most robust phylogenetic framework yet available for the tribe and establish a foundation for future systematic, biogeographic, and evolutionary research.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
30.2%
2
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.6%
3
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
5
Systematic Entomology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
6
Plants
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.1%
8
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.3%
10
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
11
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
12
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
14
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
15
Biotropica
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
16
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
17
Applications in Plant Sciences
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
21
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.8%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%
23
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
25
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
26
Plant Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
27
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%