Non-coding DNA dictates cell size and impairs fitness by sequestering RNA polymerase
Estrada, M. E.; Ohsawa, S.; Sancho-Andres, G.; Lu, N.; Qi, W.; Lima, S. S.; Skotheim, J.; Neurohr, G. E.
Show abstract
Genome size varies greatly between organisms, largely because of varying amounts of non-coding DNA. In multicellular organisms, non-coding DNA can make up 99% of the genome while unicellular organisms have little non-coding information. How non-coding DNA affects cell physiology remains a key question in understanding genome evolution. Here, we developed a system to conditionally accumulate large amounts of non-coding DNA in budding yeast cells. We show that cells adjust their size to DNA content, regardless of its coding capacity. The direct coupling of cell size to DNA content occurs independent of the known cell size control and DNA damage checkpoints and explains the long-observed correlation between cell size, genome size, and ploidy. Furthermore, we find that excess non-functional DNA compromises cell fitness and renders them hyper-sensitive to transcription inhibitors. Providing a potential explanation for this observation, we uncover that the transcription machinery binds non-coding DNA and it is titrated away from coding genes, resulting in a reduced overall concentration of yeast transcripts. We propose that the inability of yeast to repress non-coding DNA increases the fitness cost associated with non-functional DNA and prevents its expansion in the yeast genome on evolutionary timescales.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mitochondrial function regulates cell growth kinetics to actively maintain mitochondrial homeostasis 95%
- Evolutionary diversification reveals distinct somatic versus germline cytoskeletal functions of the Arp2 branched actin nucleator protein 95%
- piRNAs Coordinate poly(UG) Tailing to Prevent Aberrant and Permanent Gene Silencing 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.