Back

Speed Synchrony Promotes Collective Motion in Mixed-Species Fish Schools

Tiwari, J.; Nabeel, A.; Torsekar, V. R.; Dhar, J.; Lamshana, F.; Guttal, V.

2026-07-14 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.07.10.737720 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Principles of collective motion are now well established, though research has largely focused on homogeneous groups. Heterogeneity is widespread in animal groups, e.g. arising from sex, size or even species, raising a central question: can collective behaviour emerge when individuals have distinct behaviours? Here, we combine experiments and modelling to investigate mixed-species collective motion using two closely related fish species, rosy barbs and tiger barbs. In conspecific groups, both species exhibit collective motion, but they differ strikingly in their intrinsic movement: tiger barbs exhibit slowand fast-swimming, whereas rosy barbs display fast swimming only. Despite this difference, these species readily form mixed-species schools where the slow swimming speed of tiger barbs disappears, and the collective motion is dominated by a single fast-swimming mode. We develop an individual-based model incorporating local interactions involving speed matching. Our model demonstrates that bimodal speed in conspecific schools of tiger barbs is an emergent property that is lost in mixed-species groups. Additionally, despite high cohesion, we observe spatial sorting of the two species within the mixed-species groups, which our model explains through differences in inter- and intra-specific interactions. Our results provide experimental evidence that canonical principles of collective motion extend to heterogeneous mixed-species groups.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.7%
2
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.5%
3
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
4
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.2%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 24%
5.1%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.8%
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 12%
4.3%
9
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
10
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.2%
11
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 17%
2.1%
12
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.1%
13
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
14
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
15
The Journal of Experimental Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
16
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
17
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
19
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
20
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.5%
21
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
22
Animal Behaviour
73 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
23
Physical Review Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
24
The ISME Journal
228 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
25
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
26
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
110 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
29
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%