Back

Stomatal movement in Arabidopsis is driven by guard cell-localized and copper-insensitive CSD1 splice variant

Tsinyk, M.; Hlavackova, K.; Ovecka, M.; Rehak, J.; Sojka, J.; Spundova, M.; Kucerova, Z.; Samaj, J.; Takac, T.; Dvorak, P.

2026-07-10 plant biology
10.64898/2026.07.10.737675 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Copper (Cu) is an essential micronutrient whose bioavailability is strongly affected by soil physicochemical properties. During evolution, plants have developed mechanisms to flexibly adjust their metabolism to Cu status. Superoxide dismutases (SODs), including Cu/ZnSOD1 (CSD1) and FeSOD1 (FSD1), are key antioxidant enzymes regulated in Cu dependent manner in Arabidopsis thaliana. Examination of CSD1 cellular distribution and activity revealed that CSD1 is a nuclear and cytosolic SOD whose abundance and activity respond to Cu availability inversely to FSD1. Combined microscopic and biochemical analyses of Cu-dependent dynamics revealed that, unlike FSD1, CSD1 localization in guard cells (GCs) remains independent of Cu availability. CSD1 escapes miR398-mediated regulation in GCs through a cell type-specific splice variant (CSD1.2) that carries an altered miR398-binding site. In silico analyses indicate that this mechanism is also present in crop species. Functionally, the csd1 mutant showed reduced sensitivity to abscisic acid (ABA)-induced stomatal closure, a phenotype rescued by reintroducing CSD1. Biochemical and reactive oxygen species (ROS) level analyses indicate that CSD1.2 most likely acts independently of its canonical enzymatic activity in GCs and functions upstream of the ROS burst in the ABA signaling pathway. Together, we present a novel, cell-type-specific mechanism that safeguards ABA-driven stomatal closure under fluctuating Cu supply.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.2%
2
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.3%
3
Plant and Cell Physiology
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.6%
5
Nature Plants
94 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
6
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.2%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 17%
3.2%
8
Plant Science
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
9
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
10
Molecular Plant
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
11
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.1%
12
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
13
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
14
Development
497 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
15
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.1%
16
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
17
Journal of Integrative Plant Biology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
18
The Plant Cell
161 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
20
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.8%
22
Plant Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
23
Plant Stress
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.6%