Back

Conserved core RNAi machinery in trematode-vectoring snails indicates gene silencing potential in the absence of classical systemic and amplification effectors

Famakinde, D. O.; Lonergan, C.; Gobert, G.; Wells, D.; McVeigh, P.

2026-07-14 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.07.10.737666 bioRxiv
Show abstract

RNA interference (RNAi) is a widely exploited reverse-genetics tool with potential uses for disease control. Successful RNAi has been reported in trematode-vectoring snails, but the composition of RNAi effector-encoding gene complements, a key driver for RNAi efficiency, remain unstudied in these species. Using bioinformatics and comparative genomics, we searched for orthologues of 115 RNAi effector sequences in genomes or transcriptomes of four snail vectors: Biomphalaria glabrata, B. pfeifferi, Bulinus truncatus, and Lymnaea staginalis. Gene expression patterns of selected RNAi effectors were then examined across developmental stages and tissues of the model B. glabrata snail. At least 74 RNAi-related proteins were conserved across all four species, including core components known to be essential for gene silencing. Classical systemic RNAi-deficient (SID) genes that facilitate systemic RNAi in other systems were absent, suggesting that alternative pathways may compensate for dsRNA uptake and transport. Core effectors of secondary RNAi amplification and heritable RNAi were not detected. Expressions of Dicer-1, Argonaute-2, and the exonuclease Eri-1 did not vary significantly with snail size. A putative RNAi-inhibiting Staufen orthologue showed elevated expression in the ovotestis, while another putative cholesterol-interacting gene was overexpressed in the trunk tissue and may partly contribute to RNAi import. Altogether, our results present the most comprehensive overview of RNAi pathway effectors in major intermediate snail hosts for trematodes. The findings underscore the likely broad potential for RNAi use in trematode intermediate hosts as an experimental tool and potential control method.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.8%
2
Insect Molecular Biology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.2%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.2%
5
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.1%
6
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.1%
7
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.8%
8
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
9
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
10
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
11
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
12
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
13
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
15
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
16
International Journal for Parasitology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
Evolutionary Applications
108 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
18
Insects
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
19
The CRISPR Journal
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
21
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.0%
22
RNA Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
24
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
25
Genomics
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
International Journal for Parasitology: Drugs and Drug Resistance
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
27
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
28
Journal of Insect Physiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
29
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.6%
30
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%