Multi-omic Profiling of Recurrence Risk Across Breast Cancer Subtypes
Cruikshank, A. E.; Chandra, P.; Li, C. I.; Ha, G.
Show abstract
Recurrence risk greatly varies across intrinsic subtypes in breast cancer, yet the molecular and immune programs within primary tumors that go on to develop recurrence remains poorly understood. We performed multi-omic analysis of 340 breast cancer tumors across Basal-like, Luminal A, and Luminal B subtypes to identify tumor-intrinsic and microenvironmental features associated with recurrence. Within each intrinsic subtype, we compared recurrent and non-recurrent tumors across RNA, copy-number, and pathway-level mutational features. Basal-like tumors in patients who developed recurrence were characterized by reduced lymphocytes and pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages, enrichment of TGF-{beta}/EMT activity, copy number gains within 5p/7p/7q, 4q losses, and increased pathway tumor mutational burden (pTMB) in growth-factor, inflammatory, and motility-associated signaling pathways, each of which was associated with increased recurrence risk. In Luminal A tumors, recurrent cases showed higher lymphocytes and pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages, enrichment of metabolic, stress-response, and stemness/plasticity associated pathways, and higher pTMB in growth-factor, inflammatory, motility-associated, DNA repair and apoptosis signaling pathways all associated with recurrence risk. Among Luminal B tumors, recurrent cases were enriched for proliferation, genomic instability, DNA repair, and stress-response pathways, showed a prominent 1q copy number amplification, and exhibited increased pTMB in Hedgehog signaling which increased recurrence risk. Subtype-specific prediction models were developed to generate recurrence-risk scores and validated using an external cohort (METABRIC; 1,170 total cases). The performance of our recurrence risk scores in METABRIC were associated with recurrence free survival (RFS) across subtypes (Basal: HR=1.27, 95% CI [1.07-1.50], p=0.006, Luminal A: HR=1.18, 95% CI [1.06-1.31], p=0.002, Luminal B: HR=1.41, 95% CI [1.03-1.93], p=0.03). Together, these findings demonstrate that primary tumors in patients who develop recurrence harbor distinct subtype-specific biological programs detectable at diagnosis and support a subtype-informed multi-omic modeling as a framework for recurrence-risk stratification.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiplexed RNA-FISH-guided Laser Capture Microdissection RNA Sequencing Improves Breast Cancer Molecular Subtyping, Prognostic Classification, and Predicts Response to Antibody Drug Conjugates 96%
- Integrative Molecular Characterization of Sarcomatoid and Rhabdoid Renal Cell Carcinoma Reveals Determinants of Poor Prognosis and Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors 95%
- Adjuvant nivolumab, capecitabine or the combination in patients with residual triple-negative breast cancer: the OXEL randomized phase II study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acquired mutations and transcriptional remodeling in long-term estrogen-deprived locoregional breast cancer recurrences 97%
- Mutational landscape of pure ductal carcinoma in situ and associations with disease prognosis and response to radiotherapy 97%
- Integrative multi-omic sequencing reveals the MMTV-Myc mouse model mimics human breast cancer heterogeneity 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Burden of tumor mutations, neoepitopes, and other variants are dubious predictors of cancer immunotherapy response and overall survival 94%
- Evaluating the transcriptional fidelity of cancer models 94%
- Novel temporal and spatial patterns of metastatic colonization from rapid-autopsy tumor biopsies 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genomic profiling defines variable clonal relatedness between invasive breast cancer and primary ductal carcinoma in situ 95%
- Genome-wide association study identifies 32 novel breast cancer susceptibility loci from overall and subtype-specific analyses 94%
- Genomic evolution of pancreatic cancer at single-cell resolution 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.