Back

The 2024 International Consensus Reference Standard for Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) Research fails in Neurogenic Bladder without UTI symptoms

Tractenberg, R. E.; Groah, S. L.

2026-07-14 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.07.10.26357767 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background. The 2024 international reference standard for urinary tract infection (UTI) research scores four domains - symptoms and signs, systemic criteria, pyuria, and culture - to classify samples as No UTI, Possible UTI, Probable UTI, or Definite UTI. It explicitly identifies spinal cord injury (SCI) as a condition of impaired symptom perception, and states that catheter-associated UTI requires a separate standard. We applied it to verified-asymptomatic samples from adults with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) due to spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D) who use intermittent catheterization (IC), to test whether it can identify UTI likelihood in this population. Methods. The reference standard was applied to 224 samples from 99 adults with NLUTD due to SCI/D using IC, all verified asymptomatic by the Urinary Symptom Questionnaire for Neurogenic Bladder-Intermittent Catheter (USQNB-IC) at sampling and for 72 hours prior. Because no participant was febrile and no blood markers are drawn in this population, the systemic-criteria domain scored zero for every sample; the reported classifications are therefore a floor. Pyuria was scored under conservative and inclusive interpretations of categorical urinary white blood cell (WBC) bins. Results. Under conservative interpretation, 40.2% of samples were classified No UTI, 21.9% Possible UTI, and 37.9% Probable UTI; under inclusive interpretation, 11.6% No UTI, 38.4% Possible UTI, and 50.0% Probable UTI. No sample reached Definite UTI - a structural consequence of the empty systemic domain. Conclusions. The consensus reference standard classifies 38-50% of fully asymptomatic NLUTD-IC samples as Probable UTI, a floor estimate that could only rise if blood markers were available. This confirms the 2024 framework's own prediction that a separate standard is needed for populations with altered symptom expression and baseline-positive urinary markers.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.7%
2
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.2%
3
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
4
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.4%
6
Sexually Transmitted Infections
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
7
American Journal of Infection Control
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
8
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.5%
9
Clinical Infectious Diseases
235 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
10
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
11
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
50% of probability mass above
12
Journal of Infection
78 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
13
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.4%
14
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
Annals of Internal Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
16
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
109 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
142 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
21
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
22
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
23
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
24
American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Annals of Epidemiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
27
British Journal of General Practice
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
28
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
29
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
30
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%