Development of a Functional Needs Assessment Tool to estimate population level functional difficulties and need for services and assistive products
Boggs, D.; Birabwa, A.; Adkins, S.; Atijosan-Ayodele, O.; Bulathwela, S.; de Cates, C.; Foster, A.; Kuper, H.; Holloway, C.; Mugisha, J.; Polack, S.
Show abstract
Background: Globally, at least 2.6 billion people need rehabilitation services and more than 2.5 billion people need assistive technology (AT). However, reliable data are lacking on population level need for rehabilitation services and assistive products (AP) in different settings for evidence-based policy and programme planning. This first study paper describes the development of the Functional Needs Assessment Tool (FNAT), a new survey tool developed to fill this data gap between 2018 and 2023. Objective: To develop a new multidomain tool to assess population-level functional difficulties and need for service and AP utilising both self-report and clinical assessment methodologies. Development stages: FNAT was developed based upon primary and secondary data analysis, existing survey tools and expert consultation through a series of four steps: Step 1 Inform, Step 2 Build, Step 3 Draft and Step 4 Develop. FNAT uses both self-reported and clinical assessment tools to estimate the prevalence of functional difficulties/impairment and the need for services and AP in the following seven domains: vision, hearing, mobility, communication, cognition, self-care and mental health. It uses a two-stage population-based assessment with data collection through a bespoke tablet-based mobile application and web-based platform. Discussion: FNAT is a new multi-domain modular tool developed to address data gaps by estimating prevalence of functional difficulties and service/AP needs in a population. Potential advantages and disadvantages were highlighted during the development stages, and the tool needs to be pilot tested to assess the feasibility of the methodology and the functionality of the tablet-based mobile data collection application.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.