Back

A single dynamical property can account for the capacity to learn, from artificial networks to the mammalian brain.

Hengen, K. B.; Chopra, R.; Zhong, J.; Miller, E. S.; Bekele Tolossa, G.; Fosque, L. J.; Meza, J. A.; DeKorver, N. W.; Guerriero, R.; Ritter, N. J.; Lambo, M. E.; Bhaskaran-Nair, K.; Van Hooser, S. D.; Shew, W.

2026-07-10 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.09.737603 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Every brain must adapt to an unpredictable world, yet individuals differ in how readily they learn. Theoretical work suggests that learning is fastest when a system, whether biological or synthetic, is initialized in a state close to instability - i.e., near criticality - because critical dynamics are imbued with a diverse repertoire of patterns and multi-scale correlations. Here, we empirically estimate distance to criticality in the brain and show that it predicts the rate of adaptability underlying learning, neuronal tuning, and general intelligence. In mouse motor cortex, proximity to criticality forecasts learning rate of two future complex tasks: prey capture hunt and ladder crossing. In contrast, distance to criticality predicted neither an animal's naive ability nor its asymptotic skill - isolating the rate of learning itself. In visual cortex of young ferrets, proximity to criticality predicts how strongly experience reshapes neural tuning. In human frontal cortex, it correlates with general cognitive ability. A minimal recurrent network model reproduced these results and offers a mechanism: proximity to criticality defines the timescale over which a system can learn from its past experiences, directly setting the rate of learning. A single dynamical property can account for the capacity to learn, from artificial networks to the mammalian brain.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 2%
13.1%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 17%
9.9%
3
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 9%
9.9%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 10%
6.8%
6
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
8
Neuron
337 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
9
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
10
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.4%
11
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
12
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.0%
13
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
14
Neural Computation
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
15
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
17
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.4%
18
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
19
Biological Cybernetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
20
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
21
Physical Review Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
22
Progress in Neurobiology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
23
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
25
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
26
Physical Review X
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
27
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.6%