Back

Synonymous codon usage is biased for and against m⁶A RRACH motifs in mammals

Creasey, L. D.; Tauber, E.

2026-07-14 genomics
10.64898/2026.07.09.737571 bioRxiv
Show abstract

RNA methylation at N6-adenosine (m6A) predominantly occurs within RRACH motifs, yet the forces shaping these motifs in coding regions remain unclear. Here we show that the synonymous codon combinations able to form or disrupt RRACH sites are used non-randomly across mammals. Using 13,491 protein-coding genes from 261 species, we identified genes significantly enriched or depleted in RRACH motifs, a pattern consistent with gene-specific selection for or against m6A potential. Genes enriched in RRACH sites were linked to ubiquitin-like conjugation and cell cycle regulation, whereas transmembrane and HOX genes were RRACH-poor, likely reflecting sequence incompatibility with CpG dinucleotides. Cross-species comparison with Caenorhabditis elegans, which lacks mRNA m6A methylation, revealed reciprocal RRACH frequencies, as expected if these motifs are under selection in m6A-competent genomes but evolve without this constraint otherwise. At the codon level, specific amino acid pairs, particularly threonine-ending dyads, were biased toward RRACH-forming codons while others were depleted, indicating that synonymous codon choice is skewed for and against motif formation. RRACH motifs were also non-randomly distributed along coding sequences, depleted near start codons and enriched toward the 3' end, consistent with known m6A profiles. Finally, analysis of cancer mutations revealed tissue-specific gain and loss of RRACH sites, reflecting context-dependent remodeling of methylation potential. Together, these results show that synonymous codon usage is systematically biased for and against m6A RRACH motifs, pointing to an evolutionary coupling between the genetic code and the epitranscriptomic landscape.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.1%
2
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.4%
3
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.8%
4
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
9.4%
6
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.1%
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.7%
8
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.9%
10
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.9%
11
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
13
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Molecular Cell
350 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.4%
16
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.1%
17
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
18
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
19
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.6%
21
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
22
The EMBO Journal
309 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
23
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.6%