Back

Evolutionary Dynamics of the Complete Chemosensory Repertoire in Kissing Bugs of the Genus Rhodnius: Divergent Odorant Receptors Contrast with Conserved Gene Families

Merle, M.; Rignault, G.; Mougel, F.; Maille, L.; Filee, J.; Folly-Ramos, E.; Almeida, C. E.; Harry, M.

2026-07-10 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.07.09.737527 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Chemosensory systems play a central role in host detection, feeding behavior, and habitat selection in hematophagous insects. Here, we performed a comparative evolutionary analysis of chemosensory gene repertoires across 13 species of the Chagas disease vector genus Rhodnius. While gustatory receptors (GRs), ionotropic receptors (IRs), odorant-binding proteins (OBPs), and chemosensory proteins (CSPs) remained globally conserved, odorant receptors (ORs) displayed extensive lineage-specific expansions, tandem duplications, dynamic transcriptomic regulation, and recurrent signatures of positive selection. Major OR expansions were observed in Rhodnius robustus and Rhodnius colombiensis, suggesting increased sensory diversification in ecologically heterogeneous lineages. In contrast, conserved GR1 expression supports the maintenance of ancestral sugar-detection pathways despite hematophagy lifestyle. We further found no evidence of the canonical insect CO2-associated GRs, suggesting alternative molecular mechanisms for CO2 perception in Triatominae. Several receptors, including Orco, also displayed shifts in selective constraints between sylvatic and domiciliary species, consistent with sensory remodeling associated with adaptation to domestic habitats. Together, our results identify ORs as the most evolutionarily dynamic component of the Rhodnius chemosensory repertoire and highlight contrasting evolutionary trajectories among chemosensory gene families during ecological diversification and vector adaptation.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.2%
2
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.9%
3
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.6%
4
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.8%
6
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.0%
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.4%
8
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.4%
9
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
10
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 20%
2.6%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
13
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
14
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
15
BMC Evolutionary Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
16
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
17
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.0%
18
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
19
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
21
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
22
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
23
Systematic Entomology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
24
Nature Ecology & Evolution
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
25
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.6%