Back

Temporal constraints on the neural signatures of narrative processing

Messi, A.-P.; Bhuyain, A.; Pylkkänen, L.

2026-07-10 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.09.737443 bioRxiv
Show abstract

How the brain constructs meaning across extended contexts remains poorly understood. While neural responses to words and sentences are well characterized, much less is known about the brain mechanisms supporting narrative comprehension. Sentence-level studies suggest that neural activation increases as word meanings are integrated into sentence meaning. At the discourse level, theories propose that narratives depend on situation models, possibly engaging networks beyond core language regions, including the default mode network. Because narrative comprehension unfolds over longer timescales, processing time may be a bottleneck. In this MEG study, we tested how representation size and presentation rate shape neural responses by varying linguistic structure (words, sentences, stories) and the speed of visual text in 1-4-word chunks. We found an early bilateral story effect in visual cortex, followed by a spatiotemporal progression of activity along the temporal lobes that culminated in a three-way contrast among word lists, sentence lists, and stories. Faster presentation altered this pattern: the left-lateralized story effect disappeared, and the right-lateralized effect became more spatially restricted. Under Fast presentation, significant effects were limited to left lateral language cortex distinguishing coherent inputs from word lists, and to two right-hemisphere story effects in extended language regions. We also observed a context effect in the Slow Story condition, with neural responses remaining constant as the narrative unfolded while they increased in the SentenceList and WordList conditions. This effect was absent under Fast presentation, suggesting story-specific comprehension that is temporally constrained. Together, the findings identify temporal constraints as a key determinant of the neural signatures of narrative processing.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.1%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 16%
11.6%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.6%
4
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 2%
9.5%
5
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.1%
7
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
8
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
9
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
10
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.3%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
12
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
13
Neuron
337 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
15
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
16
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.0%
17
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.9%
18
Neurobiology of Language
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
96 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
22
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.6%
24
Psychophysiology
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Psychological Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%