From exact gradients to exact standard errors: third-order sensitivity equations for the FOCE and FOCEI population likelihood
van de Beek, H.; Beldjenna, M.; Fidler, M. L.; Zwep, L. B.; van Hasselt, J. G. C.
Show abstract
Asymptotic standard errors for the parameters of a nonlinear mixed-effects model fitted by first-order conditional estimation (FOCE) or FOCE with interaction (FOCEI) require the observed (Fisher) information -- the negative second derivative of the population objective at the optimum. The gradient of this objective can be computed exactly from sensitivity equations, but the observed information is conventionally still formed by finite differencing, which is less accurate and step-size dependent. Our objectives are to (i) derive the FOCE and FOCEI observed information in closed form within the same sensitivity-equation framework, and (ii) quantify the precision this recovers. Writing the objective as a data term plus the log-determinant of the first-order inner Hessian, the population Hessian splits so that the data term reuses the second-order sensitivities already needed for the gradient, whereas the log-determinant term requires third-order sensitivity equations -- confining the third-order dependence to a single term, where it enters in exactly two places. A finite-difference error analysis shows the differenced Hessian attains an accuracy no better than the square root of the objectives evaluation accuracy, whereas the analytic form is limited only by the sensitivity and differential-equation solutions, with no step size to tune. We illustrate this on a one-compartment oral model with first-order absorption fitted to warfarin data, where the differenced standard error is usable only over a narrow band of step sizes while the analytic value carries none. Implemented in the open-source R package nlmixr2, the method makes exact, reproducible standard errors routine, supporting more dependable confidence intervals, identifiability assessment, and uncertainty propagation.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- EpiLPS: a fast and flexible Bayesian tool for near real-time estimation of the time-varying reproduction number 95%
- Efficient inference for agent-based models of real-world phenomena 93%
- CrossLabFit: A Novel Framework for Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Data Across Multiple Labs for Model Calibration 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Theoretical properties of nearest-neighbor distance distributions and novel metrics for high dimensional bioinformatics data 94%
- Estimating the basic reproduction number at the beginning of an outbreak under incomplete data 93%
- Estimating multiplicity of infection, allele frequencies, and prevalences accounting for incomplete data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Statistical inference of mechanistic models from qualitative data using an efficient optimal scaling approach 95%
- Exact expressions and numerical evaluation of average evolvability measures for characterizing and comparing G matrices 94%
- Identifiability analysis for models of the translation kinetics after mRNA transfection 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.