Transposon end recognition and pairing by I-F3 CRISPR-associated transposase
Truong, V.; Miller, D.; Fatma, S.; Sheng, Y.; Pindi, C.; Ahsan, M.; Palermo, G.; Kellogg, E. H.
Show abstract
To develop gene therapy tools based on CRISPR-associated transposons (CASTs), it is essential to define how transposon ends are recognized and paired during transposition. Tn7-like transposons typically contain asymmetric left- and right-end sequences that flank and define DNA cargo. However, how the transposase recognizes these different sequences and assembles them into a paired end complex for cut-and-paste transposition remains unknown. Here we present the cryo-EM structure of type I-F3 (VchCAST) CAST transposase TnsB in complex with transposon DNA ends and host factor IHF, along with biochemistry, molecular dynamics, and in vivo analyses. Our structure reveals the stoichiometry and architecture of the assembly, as well as the DNA distortions required to accommodate transposon end asymmetry. Molecular dynamics suggests that these distortions are required for the coordinated assembly of the complex. Physical pairing of asymmetric left and right ends results in a novel protein-protein interface that is required for transposition efficiency. Our findings explain how transposases regulate the pairing of transposon end sequences for high-fidelity recognition, reveal a model of transposon end synapsis, and suggest future avenues to engineer DNA cargo for genome-editing applications.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Structure-guided engineering of type I-F CASTs for targeted gene insertion in human cells 98%
- Structural basis of Ty3 retrotransposon integration at RNA Polymerase III-transcribed genes 98%
- Melbournevirus encodes a shorter H2B-H2A doublet histone variant that forms structurally distinct nucleosome structures. 98%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.