Back

Hybrid quantum-classical de novo design of MHC-binding peptides

Engdal, E. S.; Funk, J.; Bacarreza, O.; Machado, L.; Johansen, K. H.; Kemming, J.; Farnsworth, T.; Brasas, V.; Lefevre-Morand, R. Y. L.; Slysz, M.; Noerregaard, O. L.; Sandberg, O. A. D. A.; Makarovskiy, A.; Lodahl, P.; Acevedo-Rocha, C. G.; Kurowski, K.; Hadrup, S. R.; Clements, W. R.; Jenkins, T.

2026-07-10 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.07.09.736951 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Deep generative models have become a leading approach for designing therapeutic molecules, yet efficiently exploring vast biomolecular sequence spaces remains difficult, particularly for targets with limited training data. The prior distribution that seeds a generative model shapes which regions of sequence space it explores, and recent work suggests that non-classical distributions sampled from quantum processors can serve as a structured alternative to the factorised Gaussian priors used by default. Whether such priors help on complex biological design tasks has been largely untested. Here we present the first end-to-end hybrid quantum-classical pipeline for de novo design of MHC class I-binding peptides, coupling a generative adversarial network (GAN) to latent vectors sampled from a real photonic quantum processor. Tested in silico across 131 HLA alleles, quantum-derived priors increased the yield of predicted strong binders, with the largest relative gains for understudied alleles where classical baselines perform worst. We selected three understudied alleles for further evaluation, finding that large gains coincided with broader sequence exploration at non-anchor positions while anchor specificity was preserved. On these three alleles, we validated the designs in vitro using peptide-MHC stability ELISAs, confirming that quantum-designed peptides are potent stabilisers of peptide-MHC class I complexes. These results establish structured, hardware-realisable non-classical priors as a useful inductive bias for generative peptide design, with direct relevance to personalised immunotherapies and vaccines.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
mAbs
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 15%
11.9%
3
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.2%
4
Chemical Science
73 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 15%
3.4%
6
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.7%
9
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.4%
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.4%
11
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.1%
12
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
13
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
14
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
Journal of the American Chemical Society
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.4%
18
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
19
Advanced Intelligent Systems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
20
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
24
ACS Central Science
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
25
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
27
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
28
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Nature Biomedical Engineering
47 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%