Back

Characterizing adolescent-reported experiences of food insecurity in the ten Canadian provinces in 2019, 2020, and 2021: A cross-sectional analysis

Pepetone, A.; Frongillo, E. A.; Vanderlee, L.; Dodd, W.; Wallace, M. P.; Dubin, J. A.; Dodd, K. W.; Hammond, D.; Kirkpatrick, S. I.

2026-07-13 nutrition
10.64898/2026.07.09.26357674 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objectives: Estimate the prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of adolescent-reported food insecurity experiences from 2019-2021. Methods: Repeat cross-sectional data were collected in November-December 2019, 2020, and 2021 from adolescents aged 10-17 years living in the ten Canadian provinces (n = 11,057). The prevalence of ten items and five food insecurity subconstructs based on the 10-item Child Food Insecurity Experiences Scale was estimated. Weighted multinomial logistic regression assessed associations between sociodemographic characteristics and food insecurity experiences as a four-level (no, few, several, or many experiences) variable. Results: Across 2019-2021 among adolescents, the prevalence of worrying about food scarcity ranged between 18.4%-22.5%, worrying about parental/guardian ability to get food ranged between 22.8%-26.9%, and not being able to get the food they wanted ranged between 23.5%-26.1%. Close to or above one in four adolescents affirmed the uncertainty (range: 26.9%-29.9%) and compromised diet quality or preferences (range: 23.5%-26.1%) subconstructs. In 2021, adolescents identifying as Black had a higher relative risk ratio of few food insecurity experiences (adjusted relative risk ratio (ARRR): 2.04 [95% CI: 1.20, 3.47], p-value: <0.01) and adolescents identifying as Indigenous had a higher relative risk ratio of several food insecurity experiences (2.38 [1.10, 5.15], p-value 0.03) compared to adolescents identifying as White. The relative risk ratio of having few, several, or many food insecurity experiences also differed by age, sex-at-birth, perceived income adequacy, and region. Conclusion: The type and number of experiences reported underscores the value of directly measuring food insecurity. Interventions to mitigate food insecurity's adverse consequences are warranted.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Public Health Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
Appetite
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.6%
4
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.8%
5
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Nutrition
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
7
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.2%
8
The Journal of Nutrition
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
9
Nutrients
67 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
10
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.5%
11
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
12
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
13
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
14
Gut
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
15
Global Health Action
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
16
Public Health in Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
17
International Journal of Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
18
Health & Place
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
20
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
21
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.6%