Back

Multi-Omics-Based Sex Stratification Identifies Distinct High-Risk Phenotypes in HFpEF

Esenkova, E. E.; Koeck, T.; Rapp, S.; Bauer, K. I.; Zeid, S.; Rausch, F. S.; Wild, P. S.; Casiraghi, E.; Araldi, E.

2026-07-13 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.07.09.26357645 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for more than half of heart failure cases and is characterized by substantial clinical and biological heterogeneity. Sex differences are central to HFpEF pathophysiology, yet current phenotyping approaches often aggregate women and men, potentially obscuring distinct molecular mechanisms of disease progression. Molecularly resolved, sex-specific stratification is therefore needed to identify divergent risk pathways and improve biological understanding of HFpEF heterogeneity. Methods. In 698 HFpEF participants from the prospective MyoVasc cohort (379 females, 319 males), we run separate analyses on sex-specific cohorts. For each cohort, we integrated 92 circulating proteins (Olink Inflammation panel) and 49 clinical variables using Similarity Network Fusion to construct sex-stratified patient-patient similarity networks. Spectral clustering identified sex-specific prognostic subgroups related to the primary endpoint, i.e. worsening of Heart Failure (WHF). XGBoost models characterizing cluster-defining features were validated in an independent cohort of 342 HFpEF patients from the Gutenberg Health Study (GHS; 194 females, 148 males). Results. Two clusters emerged in each sex, with high-risk and low-risk clusters, showing the difference in WHF risk (MyoVasc females: HR 2.45, 95% CI 1.32-4.54, p=0.005; males: HR 2.77, 95% CI 1.27-6.04, p=0.011; C-index 0.62-0.63). Kaplan-Meier analyses confirmed separation (p<0.02 females, p<0.01 males). Clusters were reproduced in GHS using MyoVasc-trained XGBoost (females p=0.0082, males p=0.037). Shared top-ranking features included VEGF-A, TNFRSF9, and TGF-. Females were characterized by inflammatory (CD40, HGF, TNF) and glycemic signatures, whereas males showed prominence of immune-regulatory markers (IL-10RB, PD-L1) and renal function indicators (eGFR, creatinine). Conclusions. Sex-stratified molecular-clinical networks define prognostically distinct HFpEF subgroups with robust external validation. Shared protein biomarkers alongside sex-specific drivers reveal complementary progression mechanisms, supporting precision medicine strategies targeting high-risk cluster patients in sex-specific manner.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Heart Journal
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.5%
3
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
4
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.7%
5
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.7%
6
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
48 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.4%
8
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
9
Cardiovascular Research
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.0%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.3%
11
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
12
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.9%
15
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
17
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
18
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
European Respiratory Journal
59 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
20
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
22
Heart
11 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
23
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
25
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
BioData Mining
22 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
27
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
28
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
29
Nature Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
30
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%