Back

Prediction of brucellosis incidence in China's five highest-incidence provinces: Comparing time-series models with multi-source environmental predictors

QIN, Y.; Gao, Q.; Liu, H.; Fan, H.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, W.; Li, C.; Chen, Q.; Cui, Z.

2026-07-13 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.07.09.26357632 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Brucellosis is a severe zoonotic disease with pronounced seasonality and regional heterogeneity in high-incidence areas of China. Reliable forecasting tools are needed to inform prevention strategies, but the optimal modeling approach across different regions remains unclear. Principal Findings We collected monthly brucellosis incidence and 17 environmental variables from 2014 to 2024 across five high-incidence provinces: Inner Mongolia, Xinjiang, Shanxi, Heilongjiang, and Hebei. A three-step procedure--cross-correlation analysis, multicollinearity diagnostics, and stepwise regression--was used to select exogenous predictors. We then compared four time-series models: seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA), SARIMA with exogenous variables (SARIMAX), long short-term memory (LSTM), and LSTM with exogenous variables (LSTMX). All five provinces showed a unimodal seasonal pattern with peaks between April and July, though environmental drivers and optimal lag periods varied substantially by region, ranging from 1 to 6 months. In forecasting performance, LSTM achieved the highest accuracy in Shanxi (R2=0.925), Hebei (R2=0.876), and Xinjiang (R2=0.829), outperforming SARIMA and SARIMAX. LSTMX performed best in Inner Mongolia (R2=0.759) and Heilongjiang (R2=0.772) but showed weaker performance than LSTM in Shanxi and Hebei. Overall, adding exogenous variables did not consistently improve predictions across provinces. Conclusions Our findings demonstrate that LSTM-based models offer clear advantages for brucellosis forecasting in most high-incidence provinces, but the value of incorporating environmental predictors is region-dependent. These results support the development of tailored early warning systems and precision prevention strategies for brucellosis in high-risk areas of China.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
13.4%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 13%
13.4%
3
Infectious Disease Modelling
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
4
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.0%
5
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.7%
6
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
8
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
68 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.5%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.2%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.2%
11
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
12
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.0%
13
GeoHealth
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
14
International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
15
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
16
Epidemiology and Infection
89 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
18
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
19
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
Parasites & Vectors
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
129 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
25
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.6%
27
Acta Tropica
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
28
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
29
Pathogens
56 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
142 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%