Elevated TRAF6 expression confers radioresistance and predicts poor prognosis in cervical cancer
chen, J.; Jin, Y.; Li, H.; Lv, X.; Zhao, Q.; Ma, Z.; Yang, Y.; Yang, D.-H.; Zhou, L.; Peng, L.
Show abstract
Abstract Background: The lack of effective biomarkers and therapeutic targets to overcome radioresistance in cervical cancer remains a major clinical challenge. Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6), an E3 ubiquitin ligase pivotal in immune and inflammatory signaling, has been implicated in various malignancies. However, its role in radioresistance in cervical cancer remains unclear. Methods: TRAF6 expression was evaluated in cervical cancer tissues from 162 patients who underwent postoperative radiotherapy at our institution and in 304 cases from the TCGA-CESC cohort. The prognostic significance of TRAF6 was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. A nomogram integrating TRAF6 expression with clinicopathological factors was constructed to predict overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The functional role of TRAF6 in malignant phenotypes and radiosensitivity was investigated using shRNA-mediated knockdown in HeLa and C33A cervical cancer cells. Immune cell infiltration patterns associated with TRAF6 expression were analyzed using ssGSEA and xCELL algorithms based on TCGA data. Results: TRAF6 expression was significantly elevated in cervical cancer tissues compared with adjacent normal tissues (70.99% vs. control, P < 0.001) and was higher in radioresistant than in radiosensitive patients (P < 0.001). High TRAF6 expression was associated with shorter OS (HR = 18.73, P = 0.004) and PFS (HR = 8.44, P < 0.001) and was identified as an independent risk factor for radiotherapy resistance (OR = 8.44, P < 0.001). The TRAF6-integrated nomogram demonstrated good predictive accuracy for OS (C-index = 0.7351) and PFS (C-index = 0.7444). TRAF6 knockdown in cervical cancer cells significantly suppressed proliferation, migration, and invasion, while substantially enhancing radiosensitivity of tumor cells. Functional enrichment analysis revealed that TRAF6-related genes were enriched in autophagy, mitophagy, and HPV infection pathways. Immune cell infiltration analysis showed that TRAF6 expression correlated with distinct immune cell profiles, characterized by enrichment of activated dendritic cells, M1 macrophages, and regulatory T cells, alongside depletion of cytotoxic effectors such as CD8+ T cells and {gamma}{delta} T cells. Conclusions: TRAF6 could be a prognostic biomarker associated with poor outcomes and indicator of radiotherapy resistance in cervical cancer, TRAF6 represents a potential therapeutic target for overcoming radioresistance in cervical cancer.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- mTOR inhibitors as radiosensitizers in neuroendocrine neoplasms 94%
- BNIP3 upregulation characterizes cancer cell subpopulation with increased fitness and proliferation 93%
- Patient stratification of clear cell renal cell carcinoma using the global transcription factor activity landscape derived from RNA-seq data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Glyoxalase 1: emerging biomarker and therapeutic target in cervical cancer progression 96%
- Survival benefit of adjuvant therapy following neoadjuvant therapy in patients with resected esophageal cancer: a retrospective cohort study 95%
- Identification of cuproptosis and ferroptosis-related subtypes and development of a prognostic signature in colon cancer 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A multi-gene predictive model for the radiation sensitivity of nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on machine learning 97%
- CPT1A Mediates Radiation Sensitivity in Colorectal Cancer 94%
- Gamma Knife Stereotactic radiotherapy combined with tislelizumab as later-line therapy in pMMR/MSS/MSI-L metastatic colorectal cancer: A Phase II Trial Analysis 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.