Back

Organism spectrum and no-growth fraction of deep specimens in code-defined orthopedic infection: a reproducible, cross-sectional MIMIC-IV benchmark

Adiniaev, Y.; Gorenshtein, A.; Timor, T. M.; Klang, E.; Geftler, A.

2026-07-10 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.07.09.26357616 medRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract Introduction. Culture data guide orthopedic-infection management, yet the organism spectrum, resistance, and no-growth fraction are reported inconsistently and mostly within proprietary registries. We characterized these in a public, reproducible dataset. Methods. Retrospective cross-sectional study using MIMIC-IV version 3.1, a de-identified single-center US database. Episodes with an International Classification of Diseases diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) or native osteomyelitis were identified; organism-spectrum and no-growth analyses were restricted to the 46% with at least one deep musculoskeletal culture (tissue or bone, synovial or joint fluid, implant sonication), so the benchmark describes culture-sampled, not all, coded episodes. Proportions carry exact 95% CIs; variation was tested by logistic regression with Benjamini-Hochberg control, and an out-of-fold logistic model quantified how well no-growth was anticipated by structured data. Results. Of 7697 episodes (median age, 60 years; 35.5% female), 1089 were PJI, 5715 native osteomyelitis, and 893 other device infection. Among 7700 deep specimens (3560 episodes; 2603 patients), 35.7% showed no growth (patient-clustered 95% CI, 34.0%-37.3%). The fraction was higher in PJI than osteomyelitis (48.6% vs 26.6%) but rose with sampling intensity (24.5% to 50.7%), indicating differential ascertainment. S. aureus led (32.5%; 43.3% methicillin-resistant), and PJI was less often polymicrobial than osteomyelitis (adjusted OR, 0.44). No-growth was weakly anticipated by structured data (out-of-fold AUROC, 0.63). Conclusions. About one-third of deep specimens from code-defined orthopedic infection showed no growth. This specimen-level fraction differs from a criterion-confirmed culture-negative-infection rate and depends on sampling intensity; it is released as a re-runnable benchmark on identical open data, not a transferable rate.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.