Back

RadGuide AI: Development and Technical Evaluation of a General Nuclear Medicine Agent for Traceable Radiopharmaceutical Decision Support

Gu, X.; Zhu, H.; Zhong, F.; Teng, G.-J.

2026-07-10 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.07.09.26357614 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Nuclear medicine and radiopharmaceutical development require coordinated radiochemistry, dosimetry, molecular imaging, radiation-safety and clinical decision processes. Current workflows remain fragmented, difficult to audit and poorly standardised for evaluating domain-specific AI support. Methods: We developed RadGuide AI, a nuclear medicine agent built around a traceable data-model-tool loop. Patent, literature and clinical-trial records were converted into 15,596 initial QA items; relevance screening, completeness checks, semantic deduplication and cross-validation retained 5,474 core QA items. MedGemma-27B-Instruct served as the foundation model and was adapted with LoRA. The system incorporated 55 MCP-wrapped tools covering radiopharmaceutical R&D, clinical decision support, imaging analysis and radiation-safety/dosimetry. Evaluation used a locked N=200 benchmark with predefined denominators, leakage control, expert scoring, statistical procedures, factuality audits and tool-execution metrics. Results: RadGuide-LLM achieved 88.5% answer accuracy (177/200; 95% CI, 83.3-92.2%) and a Macro-Average score of 21.5/25 (bootstrap 95% CI, 20.9-22.0), exceeding GPT-4o, DeepSeek-V3.2 and the base MedGemma model in this technical evaluation. Supplementary audits reported guideline compliance, terminology recall, knowledge coverage, tool-routing success and preclinical/phantom dosimetry agreement with explicit denominators and confidence intervals. Interpretation: RadGuide AI converts nuclear medicine queries into auditable retrieval, tool selection, calculation, verification and reporting workflows. The findings support technical feasibility, not definitive patient-level clinical validation; prospective multicentre studies and external benchmark release remain required before clinical deployment.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
2
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
3
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.5%
4
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.2%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
6
Physics in Medicine & Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
7
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.3%
8
European Radiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.2%
10
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
11
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
12
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
13
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.8%
14
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
15
Radiotherapy and Oncology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
16
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
17
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
19
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
20
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
21
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
22
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
23
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
24
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
25
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
26
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
27
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.0%
28
Photoacoustics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
29
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
30
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%