Back

RadGuide AI: Development and Technical Evaluation of a General Nuclear Medicine Agent for Traceable Radiopharmaceutical Decision Support

Gu, X.; Zhu, H.; Zhong, F.; Teng, G.-J.

2026-07-10 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.07.09.26357614 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Nuclear medicine and radiopharmaceutical development require coordinated radiochemistry, dosimetry, molecular imaging, radiation-safety and clinical decision processes. Current workflows remain fragmented, difficult to audit and poorly standardised for evaluating domain-specific AI support. Methods: We developed RadGuide AI, a nuclear medicine agent built around a traceable data-model-tool loop. Patent, literature and clinical-trial records were converted into 15,596 initial QA items; relevance screening, completeness checks, semantic deduplication and cross-validation retained 5,474 core QA items. MedGemma-27B-Instruct served as the foundation model and was adapted with LoRA. The system incorporated 55 MCP-wrapped tools covering radiopharmaceutical R&D, clinical decision support, imaging analysis and radiation-safety/dosimetry. Evaluation used a locked N=200 benchmark with predefined denominators, leakage control, expert scoring, statistical procedures, factuality audits and tool-execution metrics. Results: RadGuide-LLM achieved 88.5% answer accuracy (177/200; 95% CI, 83.3-92.2%) and a Macro-Average score of 21.5/25 (bootstrap 95% CI, 20.9-22.0), exceeding GPT-4o, DeepSeek-V3.2 and the base MedGemma model in this technical evaluation. Supplementary audits reported guideline compliance, terminology recall, knowledge coverage, tool-routing success and preclinical/phantom dosimetry agreement with explicit denominators and confidence intervals. Interpretation: RadGuide AI converts nuclear medicine queries into auditable retrieval, tool selection, calculation, verification and reporting workflows. The findings support technical feasibility, not definitive patient-level clinical validation; prospective multicentre studies and external benchmark release remain required before clinical deployment.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.