Back

Minimal Residual Disease via circulating tumor DNA Predicts Exceptional Response in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

Morganti, S.; Song, C.; Zhou, N.; Santos, K.; Jain, P.; Walsh, L.; Li, R.; Rhoades, J.; Gilligan, K.; Kirkner, G.; Stever, C.; Patel, A.; Hughes, M. E.; Priedigkeit, N.; Makrigiorgios, G. M.; Krop, I.; Curigliano, G.; Winer, E. P.; Tolaney, S. M.; Tayob, N.; Heiling, H.; Xiong, K.; Lin, N. U.; Adalsteinsson, V. A.; Parsons, H. A.

2026-07-13 oncology
10.64898/2026.07.09.26357137 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose: Exceptional responses are frequent in patients with HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), but predictive biomarkers are lacking. We aimed to investigate the association between detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) via circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and exceptional response to first-line HER2 targeted therapy for MBC. Patients and Methods: We identified exceptional (real-world progression-free survival [rwPFS] [&ge;]3 years) and conventional (rwPFS <3 years) responders treated with first-line HER2 targeted therapy for HER2+ MBC and plasma collected at landmark timepoints (e.g., baseline, year [Y] 1, Y2, Y3, at progression). We generated personalized, tissue-informed MRD assays using MAESTRO mutation enrichment sequencing in a pooled format. The primary endpoint was the association between MRD status at Y1 and rwPFS. Results: Of 70 patients, 63 (90%) (40 exceptional and 23 conventional responders) had sufficient samples and successful assay design; MAESTRO was run on 149 samples. A median of 1,823 (range 387-5,000) tumor-specific mutations were tracked per patient. MRD was detected in 49 (32%) samples (median tumor fraction [TFx] 936 ppm; range 3.8-164,068 ppm); 15 (31%) samples had TFx <100 ppm. MRD was associated with outcomes: 0/27 [0%] exceptional versus 9/12 [75%] conventional responders (p<0.001) had detectable MRD at Y1. Exceptional responders who remained progression-free were always MRD-negative (n=30) or cleared MRD by Y1 (n=3). Six exceptional responders experienced late progression, and four of them had a Y3 sample: MRD was detected in three patients (lead time range 2.77-13.47 years), one patient had breast-only progression and was MRD-negative. Conclusions: MRD status at key timepoints is associated with exceptional response and late distant progression, supporting prospective clinical trials implementing MRD testing with highly sensitive tumor-informed assays to guide treatment de-escalation.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.7%
2
npj Breast Cancer
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
3
Annals of Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Cancer Cell
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
5
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.3%
6
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
7
Nature Cancer
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
8
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.8%
9
Breast Cancer Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
10
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
11
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
13
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
14
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
15
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.1%
17
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.0%
18
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
19
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
20
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
21
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Cancer Discovery
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Oncogene
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%