From here to there: changing the way we evaluate equitable coverage of health services
Hagedorn, B.; Cooper, J.; Mishra, A.
Show abstract
Reducing inequality in health-service coverage is central to universal health coverage, but the evidence base on how to design successful equity-oriented policies is inadequate to inform decision makers and tends to rely on case studies. Further, conventional measures of inequality capture a single timepoint, one service at a time; this obscures how inequity evolves as coverage increases. We reframe equity as a trajectory and ask how it evolves as total coverage rises, comparing systematically across countries and health areas. Using 132 Demographic and Health Surveys from 22 low- and middle-income countries (1990-2023), we estimated coverage at the subnational (admin1) level by wealth quintile for six representative maternal and child health indicators. For each country-indicator pair, we fit a natural cubic spline of the wealthiest-poorest gap against total regional coverage, extracted features describing each curve, and grouped them using hierarchical clustering. This yielded three archetypes: large rollout gaps (mean peak ~58%), modest but persistent inequality (~30%), and minimal inequality that sometimes reversed to favor the poor (~17%). Most trajectories traced an inverted U pattern, widening early, then closing only near 100% regional coverage. How a service is delivered, more than where, drove its path: institutional delivery was the most inequitable (15 of 20 countries with large gaps), whereas one-touch and campaign-delivered services such as bed nets and vaccines rarely produced large gaps and were sometimes pro-poor. Despite this, some countries achieved equity across nearly all services, indicating that proactive governance may be able to overcome structural challenges to achieve equitable outcomes. For policy, these archetypes let programs anticipate which groups will be left behind and when, replace assumed scenarios with empirical ones in impact models, and target investment early to ensure that new services achieve more equitable coverage.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Effect of Adolescent Pregnancy on Child Mortality in 46 Low- and Middle-Income Countries 94%
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and response on the utilisation of health services during the first wave in Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of the Congo 93%
- Ethnic disparities in immunisation: analyses of zero-dose prevalence in 64 low- and middle-income countries 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Geographic barriers to care persist at the community healthcare level: evidence from rural Madagascar 93%
- Drought, armed conflict and population mortality in Somalia, 2014-2018: a statistical analysis 93%
- Improving the efficiency of scale-up and deployment of community health workers in Mali: a geospatial analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Lifetime Risk of Maternal Near Miss morbidity in Asia, Africa, the Middle East, and Latin America: a cross-country systematic analysis 93%
- A Healthcare Service Delivery and Epidemiological Model for Investigating Resource Allocation for Health: The Thanzi La Onse Model 92%
- Cost-effectiveness of public health strategies for COVID-19 epidemic control in South Africa: a microsimulation modelling study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving outcomes for children with malaria, diarrhoea and pneumonia in Mozambique through the inSCALE technology innovation: A cluster randomised controlled trial 92%
- Implementation of Smart Triage combined with a quality improvement program for children presenting to facilities in Kenya and Uganda: An interrupted time series analysis 90%
- Impact of a pilot mHealth intervention on treatment outcomes of TB patients seeking care in the private sector using Propensity Scores Matching – Evidence collated from New Delhi, India 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.