Back

APOBEC3G expression marks a TMB-high, T cell-inflamed tumor state and is associated with response to immune checkpoint blockade in multiple cancer cohorts

Butler, K.; Yesudhas, D.; Lone, B.; Banday, A. R.

2026-07-13 genomics
10.64898/2026.07.08.737369 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Immune checkpoint therapies have transformed clinical practice; however, reliable biomarkers to predict response remain limited. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) has emerged as an important biomarker because it is thought to reflect neoantigen load, yet its predictive utility has been inconsistent. This limitation may partly arise because TMB primarily captures tumor-intrinsic immunogenicity, which is heterogeneous and does not fully reflect the state of antitumor immunity. To identify transcriptomic surrogates that capture both high mutational burden and antitumor immune activation, we investigated whether mRNA expression of mutagenic APOBEC3 family members could serve as surrogates for high TMB and T cell-rich tumors. Using a pan-cancer computational framework, we evaluated the association of four APOBEC3 genes with mutational burden, neoantigen load, immune infiltration, and immune checkpoint blockade response. Among APOBEC3A, APOBEC3B, APOBEC3G, and APOBEC3H, APOBEC3G emerged as the strongest and most consistent marker of a TMBhighCD8high and NeoantigenhighCD8high tumor phenotypes. Single-cell analyses further demonstrated that APOBEC3G is enriched in both malignant cells and T cells compared with other APOBEC3 family members, with APOBEC3G-positive CD8+ T cells exhibiting elevated activation markers including GZMB and IFNG. Importantly, retrospective analyses of 50 immune checkpoint blockade cohorts showed that APOBEC3G had the most consistent association among APOBEC3 family members with treatment response and clinical outcomes. Together, these findings identify APOBEC3G as a candidate transcriptomic marker of a TMB-associated, T cell-inflamed tumor state linked to immune-checkpoint blockade benefit, warranting further prospective validation.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancer Cell
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
2
OncoImmunology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
4
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.9%
5
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.6%
6
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
75 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.1%
8
Nature Cancer
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
9
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
10
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
12
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.9%
14
Annals of Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
15
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
16
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
17
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
20
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
21
Oncogene
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
23
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
25
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 38%
0.6%
27
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.6%