Back

Fabrication and Use of a 32-Well LED-Embedded Microplate for Optogenetic Dynamic Control

Jaiswal, B.; Black, T.; Namboothiri, H. R.; Pochana, K.; Hu, C. Y.

2026-07-10 synthetic biology
10.64898/2026.07.08.737360 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Optogenetic control enables light-actuated regulation of gene expression and provides a programmable interface between living cells and electronic systems. However, routine prototyping of optogenetic constructs remains limited by infrastructure. Existing closed-loop platforms often require chemostats, microfluidics, robotic handling, or custom optical sensors, which can increase cost, reduce accessibility, or constrain measurement performance. Here, we present LEMOS 2.0, an updated LED-Embedded Microplate for Optogenetic Studies, a low-cost device for optogenetic stimulation and gene-circuit characterization inside standard off-the-shelf microplate readers. LEMOS 2.0 builds on the original LEMOS platform by increasing throughput from 16 to 32 microwells and reducing light leakage between adjacent microwells, allowing dark conditions to be used as an additional illumination state. The device consists of a 3D-printed frame, individually addressable LEDs positioned next to each microwell, a rechargeable battery, and an onboard microcontroller for Bluetooth-based wireless communication. Biocompatible polydimethylsiloxane microwells are cast directly into the device by replica molding, allowing bacterial cultures to be stimulated while optical density and fluorescence are measured by the microplate reader. This protocol describes the full LEMOS 2.0 workflow, including device fabrication, circuit assembly, Arduino programming, PDMS microwell casting, plate-reader setup, strain and culture preparation, automated experiment execution, device cleanup, and fluorescence/OD600 data analysis. As a demonstration, the protocol uses the CcaSR optogenetic system, in which sfGFP expression is activated by green light and repressed by red light. LEMOS 2.0 is intended to make optogenetic perturbation and gene-expression characterization more accessible to wet-lab users, enabling faster design-build-test-learn cycles without requiring specialized bioreactor or microfluidic infrastructure.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
44.8%
2
Lab on a Chip
96 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
3
HardwareX
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.8%
5
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
6
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.1%
8
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
9
Synthetic Biology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
10
Advanced Materials Technologies
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
12
SLAS Technology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
13
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
14
ACS Sensors
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
15
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.1%
16
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.0%
17
Advanced Intelligent Systems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
18
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
19
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
20
Journal of Biological Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
21
Trends in Biotechnology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.6%
24
Methods
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
25
Small
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%