Back

Measuring magnetic field effects in fluorescent flavoproteins via spin-dependent fluorescence intensity requires photoexcitation to be faster than spin-independent ground state recovery

Ross, B. L.; Lodesani, A.; Aiello, C. D.

2026-07-13 biophysics
10.64898/2026.07.08.737352 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Weak magnetic fields affect many biological processes across the tree of life, though the precise molecular sensors and pathways involved in such magnetoresponses remain mostly uncharacterized. Fluorescence is a useful tool for investigating magnetic field effects in flavoproteins, as their chromophores fluorescence intensity can be shown to depend on the spin states of electronic radical pairs. Here, we describe a four-state ordinary differential equation model to understand what parameter sets result in fluorescence contrast between spin states in photocycles with singlet and triplet radical pairs. We conclude that only certain sets of parameters result in the fluorescence intensity being a good proxy measurement for singlet yield. In particular, we observe that the illumination intensity required to obtain fluorescence contrast depends on the rate of the slow spin-independent radical termination reactions that recover ground-state oxidized fluorophores. Moreover, to observe a magnetic field effect in fluorescence intensity when an external magnetic field modulates the singlet yield, the illumination intensity must be strong enough such that photoexcitation is not the rate-limiting step. This understanding suggests that flavoproteins that do not exhibit magnetic field effects in their fluorescence emission under certain experimental setups may still be sensitive to weak magnetic fields in terms of function, as magnetosensitivity in fluorescence depends strongly on illumination conditions.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
55.2%
50% of probability mass above
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 29%
5.4%
3
Physical Biology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.3%
5
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
167 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
6
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.9%
9
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
10
Biochemistry
148 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
11
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
12
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
13
The Journal of Chemical Physics
56 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
14
Biophysical Reports
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
15
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
16
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
19
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
20
in silico Plants
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
21
ACS Photonics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
22
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
23
Biology of the Cell
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%