Back

Small representative samples can capture global vascular plant diversity patterns

Baldaszti, L.; Moonlight, P.; Brummitt, N.; Pironon, S.; Sarkinen, T.

2026-07-10 plant biology
10.64898/2026.07.08.737287 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Incomplete information on distributions for a high proportion of the world's plant species together with biases in global biodiversity data mean that current estimates of plant diversity patterns are skewed. A key issue is that current predictions rely on a subset of species that is not representative of all plant species. Here we tested the feasibility of a representative sampling approach for mapping global vascular plant diversity at the finest scale where comprehensive data is available. Using the World Checklist of Vascular Plants as a reference, we generate random samples of species with increasing sample sizes from the global species pool. We compare the diversity patterns retrieved from the samples against the patterns of the reference dataset using spatially weighted correlation coefficients and four different diversity metrics. We find that at the botanical country scale, representative global maps of species and phylogenetic diversity can be created with small numbers of species (~1% [0.2% and 0.4%, respectively]) at the botanical country scale. For effective growth form and family diversity sample sizes encompassing ~20% [19.2% and 19.5%, respectively] of all species are needed. Random samples require markedly fewer species to reach high correlations than when restricting the pool of species to single plant families or genera. We show that when representative samples are used robust inferences of plant diversity patterns can be made from only a small proportion of species.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
15.0%
2
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.7%
3
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.2%
4
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
5
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.7%
6
Applications in Plant Sciences
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 7%
6.2%
8
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
9
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.4%
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.2%
11
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.9%
13
Nature Plants
94 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.9%
14
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
15
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
16
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.4%
17
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
18
Journal of Ecology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
19
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
AoB PLANTS
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
23
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Quantitative Plant Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
25
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
27
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%