Back

A frameshift mutation drives divergent biosynthesis of metallophores in Methylobacterium extorquens

Zytnick, A. M.; Yazzie, M. T.; Liebergesell, T. C. E.; Tran, E. H.; Reitz, Z. L.; Puri, A. W.; Aron, A. T.; Martinez-Gomez, N. C.

2026-07-08 microbiology
10.64898/2026.07.08.737268 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Iron is widely considered the first metallocofactor, evolving as iron-sulfur clusters in early life. While iron-chelating siderophores have been widely characterized across microbial life, the lanthanide-chelating metallophore, methylolanthanin, has only recently been described in Methylobacterium extorquens AM1. Methylolanthanin shares structural similarities to the siderophore rhodopetrobactin but contains 4-hydroxybenzoate chelating moieties in place of canonical 3,4-dihydroxybenzoates. Here we compare Methylobacterium extorquens AM1, which produces methylolanthanin, and the closely related Methylobacterium extorquens PA1, which produces rhodopetrobactin. We present a pathway for the biosynthesis of both metallophores and describe the unusual synthesis of the 4-HB moieties of methylolanthanin from tyrosine. We uncover a frameshift mutation in the predicted 3-dehydroshikimate dehydratase, mllF, that prevents production of rhodopetrobactin in AM1 through truncation of the catalytically essential N-terminus. We find that deletion of the uncharacterized gene mllG reveals a cryptic branch of the pathway, leading to production of both methylolanthanin and rhodopetrobactin. Finally, we discover that rhodopetrobactin production in this mutant is enabled through the activity of a 3-dehydroshikimate dehydratase in a separate biosynthetic gene cluster. These insights highlight an evolutionary mechanism for metallophore diversification through pseudogenization and regulation of distinct biosynthetic gene clusters with shared aromatic intermediates.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.