Back

Leveraging Homologous Recombination Deficiency via the Repositioned Prodrug CB1954

Elia, J. L.; Hill, J.; Heer, C. D.; Smolev, S.; Sykes, A. M.; Arbelaez, S. R.; Lucas, K. N.; Johnson, S. S.; Sundaram, R. K.; Herzon, S. B.; Bindra, R. S.

2026-07-09 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.07.08.737246 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is an actionable vulnerability found in a substantial fraction of human cancers, yet current HRD-directed therapies are limited by toxicity, incomplete responses, and acquired resistance. Many DNA-damaging agents were developed before DNA repair biomarkers were available, suggesting that abandoned agents may harbor previously unrecognized genotype-selective activity. Here, through a focused screen of DNA-damaging agents in isogenic homologous recombination-proficient and -deficient models, we identify CB1954, a decades-old nitrobenzamide aziridine prodrug, as highly selective for BRCA2-deficient tumor cells. CB1954 forms DNA interstrand crosslinks independent of HR status, but selectively induces DNA-damage signaling, apoptosis, and loss of clonogenic survival in HR-deficient cells. Targeted DDR CRISPR screening and isogenic validation define a distinct repair dependency for the Fanconi anemia and homologous recombination pathways, with limited dependence on mismatch repair or nucleotide excision repair. Genetic and pharmacologic perturbation of NQO2, the bioactivating enzyme for CB1954, reveals a bifurcated mechanism in which NQO2-dependent activation selectively contributes to HRD cytotoxicity, while aziridine-dependent lesions likely account for residual activity in HR-proficient cells. CB1954 exhibits favorable preclinical pharmacokinetic properties and genotype-dependent antitumor activity in BRCA2-deficient xenografts. These findings reposition CB1954 as a historically overlooked HRD-selective agent and demonstrate that biomarker-guided profiling of DNA-damaging agents can uncover new opportunities for precision oncology.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Cancer
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.9%
2
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
3
Cancer Discovery
66 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.7%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 21%
7.8%
5
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
6
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
7
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Cell Chemical Biology
94 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
9
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.4%
10
Cancer Cell
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
11
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.6%
12
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 20%
2.6%
14
Molecular Therapy Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
15
EMBO Molecular Medicine
95 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
16
Journal of Experimental Medicine
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.5%
18
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
Molecular Therapy
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
20
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
21
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
22
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.0%
23
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
25
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.6%
26
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.6%