Back

Characterising AlphaFold 3s ability to predict T cellantigen specificity

McMaster, B.; Elmoselhy, A.; Ilievski, I.; Thorpe, C. J.; La Gupta, N. L.; Rossjohn, J.; Deane, C.; Koohy, H.

2026-07-09 systems biology
10.64898/2026.07.08.737208 bioRxiv
Show abstract

T cells are a key part of the adaptive immune system. Using their surface-bound T cell antigen receptors (TCRs), these cells scan peptides and other antigens presented to them by major histocompatibility complex molecules (MHCs) on the surface of cells, searching for abnormalities. Although determining the map between TCRs and their target antigens is of vital importance for the design of safe and effective T cell-based vaccines and therapeutics, decoding these interactions is challenging. Experimental methods are not scalable, and sequence-based computational methods have issues generalising to new antigens. The IMMREP25 benchmark of methods for predicting T cell antigen specificity showed that AlphaFold-based methods promise improved generalisation to novel antigens. However, the ability of structure prediction models to predict T cell antigen specificity has not been robustly evaluated previously. In this work, we characterise AlphaFolds ability to predict T cell antigen specificity. We created a pipeline for high-throughput prediction of TCR:peptide-MHC (pMHC) structures using AlphaFold that is > 100 fold faster than the default implementation and used it to benchmark AlphaFold 3 (AF3) and similar models at predicting T cell antigen specificity. We investigated the underlying correlates of AlphaFold-derived binding scores and found that the models predictive power is related to the positioning of TCRs over the pMHC and not chemical interactions. Furthermore, we refine the AlphaFold-derived binding scores by training a machine learning model we call the PAE Aggregator. We then investigate AF3s ability to uncover the clustering rules of TCR repertoires and recapitulate mutational scanning experiments. These analyses show that AlphaFold3 clusters sequence-similar TCRs according to their binding mode and detects disrupting point mutations accurately. Our results highlight both the promise and the current limitations of structure-based approaches for predicting TCR specificity, guiding the development of more reliable immunological prediction methods.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.4%
2
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.6%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.2%
4
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.5%
5
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.5%
6
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.2%
8
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.2%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.2%
10
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
11
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.6%
12
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.6%
13
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
14
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
15
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.9%
17
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
Structure
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
19
mAbs
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
20
Molecular Systems Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
21
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
22
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
23
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.1%
24
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
25
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
ImmunoInformatics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
27
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
28
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%
29
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%