Back

Variational Autoencoder-enabled High-throughput Drug Screening for HIV Latency Modulators predicted through Noise in Gene Expression

Shukla, D.; Lu, Y.; Horne, J. R.; Mi, X.; Nag, S.; Dash, S.; Dar, R. D.

2026-07-09 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.07.08.737074 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Due to its ability to establish a pool of undetectable and latently infected cells that can initiate viral production through random reactivation, a cure to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections has remained elusive. Many approaches have been proposed, including the "shock and kill" method where latency reversing agents (LRAs) are administered to reactivate latently infected cells out of latency and remove them through immune targeting and clearance, and the "block and lock" method where latency promoting agents (LPAs) are administered to inhibit reactivation and potentially induce a "deep latency" state where infected cells can no longer reactivate. Previous large scale drug screen studies have demonstrated a correlation between a compound's capability to modulate the fluctuations (or "noise") in HIV gene expression and its potential to modulate HIV latency. However, measurements of gene expression noise are labor- and cost-intensive. To circumvent these drawbacks, we trained a variational autoencoder (VAE) on a previously published large scale time-lapse fluorescence microscopy dataset, and performed an in silico screening of ~175,000 compounds for HIV latency modulators. Out of the top 113 predicted modulators that were experimentally tested, 16 latency reversing agent (LRA) synergizers and 2 latency promoting agents (LPAs) were confirmed, yielding an overall experimental hit rate of 15.9%. Our work demonstrates that in silico drug screening modalities, guided by existing large-scale experimental datasets, can yield high experimental hit rates, reducing costs incurred from labor-intensive wet lab-focused methodologies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.3%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 6%
7.2%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.7%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.7%
5
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.2%
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Advanced Intelligent Systems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
8
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.2%
9
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
10
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
11
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 17%
2.1%
12
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.1%
13
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
14
npj Imaging
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
18
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
19
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.1%
20
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
21
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.1%
22
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
ACS Infectious Diseases
82 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%