Feasibility of Non-Invasive Atrial and Ventricular Activation, Conduction-Velocity, and Site-of-Origin Mapping with Solid-State Magnetocardiography: A Preclinical Validation Study
Brennan, K. A.; Bandyopadhyay, S.; Sillett, C.; Lyons, J.; Kameno, M.; Terazono, Y.; Ganesan, P.; Liu, X.; Ikeda, G.; Takashima, H.; Matsuura, Y.; Koike-Ieki, M.; Yang, P. C.; Rodrigo, M.; Wang, P. J.; Narayan, S. M.; Rogers, A. J.
Show abstract
Background: Characterizing cardiac activation by its site of origin, propagation, and conduction velocity underlies arrhythmia diagnosis and management, but invasive electrophysiology (EP) mapping requires vascular access, fluoroscopy, and sedation. Magnetocardiography (MCG) enables contactless mapping, and recent solid-state sensors remove the cost, cryogenic, and shielding barriers of legacy systems. We assessed the feasibility of a novel solid-state MCG system for noninvasive arrhythmia site-of-origin (SOO) localization and activation reconstruction, benchmarked against electrocardiographic imaging (ECGi). Methods: In nine swine implanted with right atrial and right ventricular pacing leads, we recorded MCG and ECGi simultaneously during atrial and ventricular pacing. Invasive epicardial contact EP mapping provided the activation-time reference and MRI-derived lead-tip location the SOO reference. Local activation time (LAT), conduction velocity (CV), and SOO were compared on a co-registered chamber mesh. SOO error was the Euclidean distance to the MRI lead tip; LAT and CV agreement with EP were quantified by Pearson r and compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results: Across 17 datasets (8 atrial, 9 ventricular), median SOO error was lower for MCG than ECGi in the atrium (19.6 vs 31.2 mm; p=0.023) and ventricle (12.0 vs 26.1 mm; p=0.074). LAT agreement with EP was comparable between modalities and higher in the ventricle (MCG r=0.63; ECGi r=0.68) compared with the atrium (MCG r=0.40; ECGi r=0.53), each correlating with invasive EP mapping above chance. CV agreement was modest and numerically higher for MCG in the ventricle. Conclusions: Solid-state MCG was feasible for noninvasive site-of-origin localization and activation mapping, with accuracy comparable to ECGi, motivating larger prospective studies to define its clinical role in noninvasive mapping.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Outcomes: The Impact Of Functional Mapping In Chagas Cardiomyopathy 94%
- In vivo assessment of cardiac radiofrequency ablation in a large-animal model using photoacoustic-ultrasound imaging 93%
- Evidence of Superior and Inferior Sinoatrial Nodes in the Mammalian Heart 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Personalized Computational Modeling Identifies Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source Patients with Potential Arrhythmic Substrate 95%
- Predicting Ventricular Tachycardia Circuits in Patients with Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy using Genotype-specific Heart Digital Twins 94%
- Coordinated Tbx3/Tbx5 transcriptional control of the adult ventricular conduction system 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Atrial functional substrates for the prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation 95%
- A Multicenter Evaluation of the Impact of Procedural and Pharmacological Interventions on Deep Learning-based Electrocardiographic Markers of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy 91%
- Prognostic value of compact myocardial thinning in patients with left ventricular non-compaction 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Heart failure, female sex and atrial fibrillation are the main drivers of human atrial cardiomyopathy: results from the CATCH ME consortium 92%
- The Effect of Medical Therapy on Reducing the Risk of Pacing Induced Cardiomyopathy 92%
- Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonism Reduces Atrial Arrhythmias Post-Cardiac Surgery and Attenuates Atrial Stress Responses to Cardioplegic Arrest 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.