Back

Feasibility of Non-Invasive Atrial and Ventricular Activation, Conduction-Velocity, and Site-of-Origin Mapping with Solid-State Magnetocardiography: A Preclinical Validation Study

Brennan, K. A.; Bandyopadhyay, S.; Sillett, C.; Lyons, J.; Kameno, M.; Terazono, Y.; Ganesan, P.; Liu, X.; Ikeda, G.; Takashima, H.; Matsuura, Y.; Koike-Ieki, M.; Yang, P. C.; Rodrigo, M.; Wang, P. J.; Narayan, S. M.; Rogers, A. J.

2026-07-13 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.07.08.26357590 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Characterizing cardiac activation by its site of origin, propagation, and conduction velocity underlies arrhythmia diagnosis and management, but invasive electrophysiology (EP) mapping requires vascular access, fluoroscopy, and sedation. Magnetocardiography (MCG) enables contactless mapping, and recent solid-state sensors remove the cost, cryogenic, and shielding barriers of legacy systems. We assessed the feasibility of a novel solid-state MCG system for noninvasive arrhythmia site-of-origin (SOO) localization and activation reconstruction, benchmarked against electrocardiographic imaging (ECGi). Methods: In nine swine implanted with right atrial and right ventricular pacing leads, we recorded MCG and ECGi simultaneously during atrial and ventricular pacing. Invasive epicardial contact EP mapping provided the activation-time reference and MRI-derived lead-tip location the SOO reference. Local activation time (LAT), conduction velocity (CV), and SOO were compared on a co-registered chamber mesh. SOO error was the Euclidean distance to the MRI lead tip; LAT and CV agreement with EP were quantified by Pearson r and compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results: Across 17 datasets (8 atrial, 9 ventricular), median SOO error was lower for MCG than ECGi in the atrium (19.6 vs 31.2 mm; p=0.023) and ventricle (12.0 vs 26.1 mm; p=0.074). LAT agreement with EP was comparable between modalities and higher in the ventricle (MCG r=0.63; ECGi r=0.68) compared with the atrium (MCG r=0.40; ECGi r=0.53), each correlating with invasive EP mapping above chance. CV agreement was modest and numerically higher for MCG in the ventricle. Conclusions: Solid-state MCG was feasible for noninvasive site-of-origin localization and activation mapping, with accuracy comparable to ECGi, motivating larger prospective studies to define its clinical role in noninvasive mapping.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.5%
2
Heart Rhythm
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
3
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.5%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 16%
5.5%
5
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
The American Journal of Cardiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.2%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.3%
8
Heart
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
9
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.2%
11
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.2%
12
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
Nature Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
15
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
16
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
17
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
18
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Advanced Healthcare Materials
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
European Heart Journal
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%