Back

Multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization of population-robust near-infrared sensors for skeletal muscle oximetry

Bhattacharyya, K.

2026-07-09 orthopedics
10.64898/2026.07.08.26357539 medRxiv
Show abstract

Designing transcutaneous skeletal muscle oxygenation (SmO2) sensors requires jointly optimizing source--detector geometry and wavelength selection while guaranteeing performance across populations that vary in subcutaneous fat thickness and skin pigmentation. We present a multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization (MFBO) framework that couples Monte Carlo light-transport simulations at two photon-count fidelities to a distributionally robust design objective. An autoregressive Gaussian-process surrogate learns the correlation between inexpensive low-photon-count and accurate high-photon-count simulations, and a cost-aware acquisition function decides both where and at what fidelity to sample. Robustness across the population is enforced with Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) and entropic-risk (ERM) objectives that target worst-case subjects rather than the population average. On a five-layer forearm tissue model with anthropometric variability we find (i) a fidelity regime that is favorable for MFBO where the low-fidelity surrogate is rank-informative (Spearman {rho} = 0.84) but biased, at 100x lower cost; (ii) MFBO attains 23% higher robust sensitivity than a strong high-fidelity single-fidelity baseline at equal budget (p = 0.035), and avoids the optimistic bias that causes low-fidelity-only optimization to collapse when its designs are validated at high fidelity; (iii) CVaR/ERM objectives improve worst-case tail performance by {approx}23% relative to a mean objective without sacrificing average sensitivity; and (iv) discovered designs improve robust tail sensitivity by roughly 3--6x over commercial and heuristic optode layouts, with the largest gains in the high-fat and high-melanin subpopulations. The methodology bridges stochastic light-transport physics with sample-efficient machine-learning optimization and generalizes to cerebral oximetry, photodynamic therapy planning, and wearable physiological monitors.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.