Back

Multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization of population-robust near-infrared sensors for skeletal muscle oximetry

Bhattacharyya, K.

2026-07-09 orthopedics
10.64898/2026.07.08.26357539 medRxiv
Show abstract

Designing transcutaneous skeletal muscle oxygenation (SmO2) sensors requires jointly optimizing source--detector geometry and wavelength selection while guaranteeing performance across populations that vary in subcutaneous fat thickness and skin pigmentation. We present a multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization (MFBO) framework that couples Monte Carlo light-transport simulations at two photon-count fidelities to a distributionally robust design objective. An autoregressive Gaussian-process surrogate learns the correlation between inexpensive low-photon-count and accurate high-photon-count simulations, and a cost-aware acquisition function decides both where and at what fidelity to sample. Robustness across the population is enforced with Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) and entropic-risk (ERM) objectives that target worst-case subjects rather than the population average. On a five-layer forearm tissue model with anthropometric variability we find (i) a fidelity regime that is favorable for MFBO where the low-fidelity surrogate is rank-informative (Spearman {rho} = 0.84) but biased, at 100x lower cost; (ii) MFBO attains 23% higher robust sensitivity than a strong high-fidelity single-fidelity baseline at equal budget (p = 0.035), and avoids the optimistic bias that causes low-fidelity-only optimization to collapse when its designs are validated at high fidelity; (iii) CVaR/ERM objectives improve worst-case tail performance by {approx}23% relative to a mean objective without sacrificing average sensitivity; and (iv) discovered designs improve robust tail sensitivity by roughly 3--6x over commercial and heuristic optode layouts, with the largest gains in the high-fat and high-melanin subpopulations. The methodology bridges stochastic light-transport physics with sample-efficient machine-learning optimization and generalizes to cerebral oximetry, photodynamic therapy planning, and wearable physiological monitors.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 2%
13.6%
2
Optics Express
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.8%
3
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.8%
4
Journal of Biomedical Optics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
5
Neurophotonics
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.4%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.4%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.3%
9
JAMIA Open
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
10
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.2%
50% of probability mass above
11
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
12
Advanced Intelligent Systems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
13
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.0%
14
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.8%
15
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
16
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
17
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.6%
18
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.6%
19
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
20
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.2%
22
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
23
Applied Sciences
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
24
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
25
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
26
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
27
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
28
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
29
Light: Science & Applications
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
30
Journal of Vision
110 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%