Resistive Load During CPAP and Automatic Tube Compensation (ATC): A Bench Comparison of ICU Ventilators

Background: Automatic tube compensation (ATC) was designed to compensate for the additional resistive load imposed by the endotracheal tube during spontaneous breathing. In ATC mode, the ventilator adds or subtracts the flow-dependent pressure drop across the tube during both inspiration and expiration so that tracheal pressure remains close to PEEP. Early prototype ventilators achieved true tracheal-pressure control and showed physiological and clinical benefits, but clinical studies with commercial systems have failed to confirm these earlier findings. A 2003 bench study found that commercial ventilators provided, at best, only partial tube compensation, unlikely to result in meaningful clinical benefit. We therefore tested whether this limitation has been remedied in contemporary ICU ventilators. Methods: We performed a bench comparison of five commercial ICU ventilators and an ATC prototype ventilator designed to accurately compensate for the flow-dependent resistance over a wide range of flow rates. An active lung simulator generated spontaneous breathing patterns with weak, moderate, and strong inspiratory efforts at different PEEP levels. We tested each breathing pattern through endotracheal tubes with inner diameters of 7 and 8 mm, and measured airway pressure, tracheal pressure, and flow during CPAP with and without ATC. Breathing through the tube against open atmosphere served as a zero-PEEP/T-piece reference. Results: In CPAP mode, the commercial ventilators showed flow-dependent airway-pressure deviations, amounting to a substantial added resistance of 1.5 - 6.5 mbar/(L/s), whereas the ATC prototype ventilator imposed an added resistance of only 0.6 mbar/(L/s). In ATC mode, the commercial ventilators reduced the resistive load by no more than by 25%, and large tracheal-pressure deviations remained, especially at higher inspiratory effort and during expiration. In some cases, the residual load during ATC was even greater than the load during unsupported breathing through the tube. By contrast, the ATC prototype ventilator maintained tracheal pressure close to PEEP throughout the breathing cycle and eliminated on average 79% of the tube-related resistive load. Conclusions: In the commercial ventilators evaluated in this study, the defining physiological objective of ATC was only partially achieved. Therefore, clinical benefits previously reported for tracheal-pressure control support should be interpreted with caution when applied to commercial ATC implementations, unless effective tube compensation has been demonstrated under relevant conditions. These findings suggest that more advanced control approaches, such as those implemented in the ATC prototype ventilator, may be required to achieve consistent and physiologically accurate tube compensation.