Back

From Current-Wave to Longitudinal Risk Prediction: A Leakage-Aware Stacked Ensemble Framework for Adolescent Substance Use Using the ABCD Study

Milla Angeles, V. M.; Otero-Leon, D.

2026-07-13 addiction medicine
10.64898/2026.07.08.26357536 medRxiv
Show abstract

Adolescent use of alcohol, nicotine, and marijuana remains a major public health concern in the United States. Early identification of youth at elevated risk is critical for prevention before use begins or escalates. We developed and evaluated a longitudinal machine learning framework to predict alcohol, nicotine, and marijuana use at the next observed assessment wave. Data came from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study Release 6.0. The models incorporated predictors from multiple domains, including demographics, friends, family and community context, mental health, physical health, and prior substance-related behaviors. To reduce information leakage across individuals, we implemented a leakage-aware stacked ensemble. This ensemble combined diverse base learners through out-of-fold predictions and an elastic-net meta-learner. Across all three substances, the lagged stacked ensemble outperformed the cross-sectional stack and all single base learners. Adolescents identified as highest risk showed substantially higher observed rates of substance use than would be expected under random screening. Feature-importance analyses showed that the full longitudinal models were strongly influenced by developmental timing and prior-use history. Analyses restricted to current-wave features revealed distinct substance-specific risk patterns beyond prior-use history and developmental timing. Bootstrap stability analyses identified top-ranked features showing consistent positive predictive relevance across resampled adolescents. These findings suggest that longitudinal, leakage-aware machine learning can generate substance-specific risk estimates to support targeted prevention and screening in adolescent populations.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
96 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
3
Addiction
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.7%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.3%
5
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
41 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
7
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.1%
8
Statistics in Medicine
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
9
Addiction Neuroscience
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
10
International Journal of Drug Policy
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
12
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Nicotine and Tobacco Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Alcohol, Clinical and Experimental Research
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
15
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
16
Biological Psychiatry
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
Neuropsychopharmacology
153 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
19
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.9%
22
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
25
Addiction Biology
51 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
Journal of Affective Disorders
92 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.6%
28
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.6%