Back

Association of Left Atrial Structure and Function with Incident Atrial Fibrillation in Black and White Adults: the ARIC Study

Li, Y.; Soliman, E. Z.; Shrestha, S.; Ogunmoroti, O.; Norby, F. L.; Sun, D.; Li, L.; Shah, A. M.; Chen, L. Y.; Alonso, A.

2026-07-09 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.07.08.26357526 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Black individuals have a lower incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) than White individuals despite a higher burden of many traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Differences in left atrial (LA) structure and function by race could partly explain the observed pattern of AF risk. Methods: This analysis included 4,576 (978 Black and 3,598 White) participants from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study, followed between 2011 and 2021. The association of selected echocardiographic measures of LA structure and function with AF incidence was evaluated with race-specific Cox proportional hazards models with adjustment for sociodemographic and clinical covariates. Additional analyses assessed whether LA measures attenuated the association between race and incident AF. Results: The analysis included 778 AF cases (113 in Black and 665 in White participants, mean age 75 years). Larger LA size and worse LA function were associated with higher AF risk in both Black and White individuals, with most associations of similar magnitude in both groups, except for a slightly stronger association of LA reservoir strain in Black than White participants (Black: hazard ratio (HR) 0.89, 95% CI 0.86-0.92 per 1% increase; White: HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.92-0.95, p for interaction = 0.01). In the overall sample, White participants showed higher AF risk compared to Black participants (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.24-2.03). Adjustment for most individual LA measures did not attenuate the association between race and AF risk. Conclusion: Larger LA size and worse LA function were associated with incident AF in both Black and White ARIC participants. However, these measures did not explain the lower AF incidence observed among Black participants. LA remodeling appears to be an important predictor of AF risk, but it is not the primary explanation for the Black-White AF paradox.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
31.9%
2
European Heart Journal
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
3
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 29%
5.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.5%
7
Circulation Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.8%
9
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
48 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
10
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
International Journal of Cardiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
13
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.4%
14
Heart
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
15
Cardiovascular Research
37 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
16
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
17
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
18
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Atherosclerosis
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
23
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
24
The American Journal of Cardiology
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Heart Rhythm
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
26
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
27
Clinical Epidemiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%