Back

Driver-independent lexAop-tdTomato.nls reporter signal in the adult Drosophila proventriculus

Zhou, X.; Zhang, T.; Kim, W. J.

2026-07-11 genetics
10.64898/2026.07.07.737111 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Reporters are widely used in Drosophila genetics to visualize gene expression and cell lineages. However, uncharacterized limitations in specific reporter lines can lead to data misinterpretation. Here, we identify a consistent, driver-independent tdTomato signal in the adult proventriculus from the widely used lexAop-tdTomato.nls reporter line. This signal was observed across multiple lexA driver combinations and was directly detectable in lexAop-tdTomato.nls responder-alone adult proventriculi lacking any lexA driver and without antibody staining. In contrast, no comparable native red fluorescence was detected in larval proventriculi under the same no-antibody imaging condition. Mouse and rabbit anti-RFP immunostaining further supported the presence of proventriculus-associated tdTomato/RFP antigen in adult responder-alone animals. In larval responder-alone proventriculi, antibody-amplified staining was antibody-source-dependent: a detectable signal was observed only with rabbit anti-RFP, whereas mouse and rat anti-RFP produced no reliable detectable signal under the same staining condition. A driver-matched comparison using lexAop-RFP.nls did not reproduce the proventricular signal, arguing against detectable ectopic activity of the tested lexA driver in this tissue. However, because lexAop-tdTomato.nls and lexAop-RFP.nls differ in reporter/transgene architecture and possibly genomic insertion context, the underlying cause cannot be assigned specifically to the lexAop sequence. Our findings highlight the necessity of including driver-negative and no-antibody controls when using this reporter line in adult Drosophila proventriculus and gut studies.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
13.6%
2
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.2%
3
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.2%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.2%
7
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.3%
8
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
9
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.5%
10
Insects
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
11
BMC Biotechnology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
12
Insect Molecular Biology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
13
Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
14
Disease Models & Mechanisms
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
15
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
16
Journal of Neurogenetics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
17
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.1%
19
Pest Management Science
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
20
Journal of Cell Science
393 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Open Biology
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Biology
45 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
23
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%
24
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
25
The Journal of Experimental Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
26
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
27
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.5%
28
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
29
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
30
BMC Neuroscience
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.5%