Back

Coding agents author interpretable single-cell embedding models from the literature

Brunn, N.; Krissmer, S. M.; Frosch, M.; Frick, M.; Prinz, M.; Binder, H.

2026-07-09 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.07.07.737048 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The single-cell literature catalogs cell states as validated marker-gene programs - a sparse, compositional prior. Conventional embedding methods do not leverage this prior and learn cell-state structure de novo from the expression matrix, producing dense dimensions needing post-hoc interpretation and batch correction. Here we show coding agents can author single-cell embedding models directly from the literature. Given a scenario that focuses this literature lens on a chosen biological subdomain, the agent edits a structured Python template, curating named, literature-cited gene programs and composing them into axes, without a gene-set database, training, or sight of the data. Across mouse and human tissues these zero-shot embeddings are competitive in biological quality with conventional, foundation-model, and program-informed baselines, batch-robust by construction and reproducible across runs, complementing data-driven embeddings. Because each dimension is a named, cited gene program, the embedding is interpretable and auditable, and its composable axes can be steered into a developmental tree.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
16.7%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.8%
3
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
12.4%
4
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.8%
6
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.2%
7
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.0%
8
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.4%
9
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
10
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.6%
11
Molecular Systems Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.4%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.7%
14
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
15
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
16
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
18
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.0%
19
Cell Genomics
172 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
20
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
21
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.8%
22
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
23
Development
497 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
26
Nature Computational Science
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%